Arizona Bill to Forbid Political Parties from Changing their Name Advances

On February 20, The Arizona Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously passed SB 1609. It forbids political parties from changing their name. It also says that no party may have the word “Independent” in is name. It is retroactive to 2024.


Comments

Arizona Bill to Forbid Political Parties from Changing their Name Advances — 14 Comments

  1. An ex post facto law is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of actions that were committed before the law was enacted, often making previously legal actions illegal or increasing penalties for past actions. In the United States, such laws are prohibited by the Constitution.

  2. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/democrats-probe-doj-alleged-withholding-203511065.html

    how many zillion investigations of tyrant trump [AND HIS GANG OF HACKS / STOOGES / PUPPETS] coming before/after noon on 3 Jan 2027 – NEXT USA CONGRESS MEET ???

    WHOLE EPSTEIN FILES MESS –

    ALLEGED VICTIMS 1 TO A ZILLION – AV
    ALLEGED FELONS 1 TO A ZILLION – AF
    GOVT COPS/PROSECUTORS – G
    OTHERS – O

    TRUE/FALSE AV ???
    TRUE/FALSE / NOT DETERMINED AF ???
    HOW MANY NO ACTION / PROSECUTED CASES WITH SAME G ???

  3. Ex post facto laws regarding criminal activity are unconstitutional. Retroactive civil laws may be permitted. Google or use AI for more information.

  4. This particular law may or may not be constitutional. The state will argue that all parties stipulate that there was no statutory law or administrative rule that explicitly allowed the Secretary of State or anyone else to change the name of a political party. There are certainly no criminal penalties here. With consolidated case challenging the name change going to Superior Court on March 18 and with a court challenge expected after the passage of this law, and then given the time for appeals, the party will likely run in 2026 ad the No Labels Party, which is the only name listed on online registration forms at Service Arizona. Candidates running in this party’s primaries are telling voters to register with the No Labels Party to sign the petitions to get them on the primary ballot. Most county recorders, the election officials, still refer to the party as No Labels since the name is part of an ongoing legal dispute. Everyone agrees that thousands of voters signed a petition to create the No Labels Party I. 2024.

  5. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/
    Clause 3 Nullification
    No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
    ArtI.S9.C3.1Historical Background on Bills of Attainder
    ArtI.S9.C3.2Bills of Attainder Doctrine
    ArtI.S9.C3.3 Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.1Overview of Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.2Historical Background on Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.3Retroactivity of Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.4Ex Post Facto Law Prohibition Limited to Penal Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.5Increasing Punishment and Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.6Imposing Criminal Liability and Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.7Civil Commitment, Sex Offender Registration, and Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.8Procedural Changes and Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.9Employment Qualifications and Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.10Retroactive Taxes and Ex Post Facto Laws
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.11Ex Post Facto Prohibition and Judicial Decisions
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.12Ex Post Facto Laws, Deportation, and Related Issues

  6. Don’t use AI for anything. It hallucinates constantly, hates humans, and will tell you to kill yourself and other people. Tell everyone you know to stay away from it. Google should be avoided too, they are an evil company in league with the devil.

    As for ex post facto laws, that’s why the US government owes restitution with compound interest to all of us descendants of those who had legally at the time owned property confiscated by an ex post facto law. That has nothing to do with whether slavery was morally right or whether the law should have been changed, it’s just a basic constitutional (and preconstitutional) principle of fairness and law. Society’s moral understanding can evolve, but restitution under the law for confiscation of property which was legal at the time, regardless of what we think of that legality, is owed by law and right.

  7. The AZ-666 SPAMBOT is obviously incapable of shame, but the owner of this site should be. We just had yet another assassination attempt against the President, and here this forum is already being used to try to drum up yet more with the constant drumbeat of ridiculous slanderous lying nonsense about the President being a “tyrant” when he’s the furthest possible thing.

    For shame!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.