On September 16, defenders of the South Dakota initiative process filed this brief in Dakotans for Health v Johnson, 25-2940. This is the lawsuit over the petition deadline. The Eighth Circuit had struck down the February deadline on August 11, 2026. Now the state is trying to get all the judges of the Eighth Circuit to overrule that decision.
Why is this a federal matter at all?
The federal courts have played a game of telephone with the constitution, inventing endless excuses to interfere in state and local matters as well as into the affairs of other federal branches, and even into private affairs and relations of individuals and companies.
Let’s keep our eyes on the prize. We need to keep Donald Trump in office, not for a thousand years, not for a million years, not for a billion years, but FOREVER! An infinity of time!
More proof that Trump is a libertarian and that libertarians have taken over the GOP under Trump:
Part 1
The Republican Party is having national midterm conventions now. Previously, only Libertarians did that, except for commie leftard parties. Not anymore.
Not only that, but at that Republican Party midterm convention, the Libertarian Party becoming ungovernable, anarchy symbol, chicken on a stick and other such logos and mottos were prominently displayed as Silk Road’s Ross Ulbricht, finally at long last freed from prison by Liberator Trump, spoke about how awesome President Trump is for liberty, freedom, and libertarianism.
Part 2:
As you might imagine, the LNC is big mad, claiming copyright infringement.
If you weren’t convinced when Trump spoke at a Libertarian national convention and publicly declared himself to be a libertarian, or when he got a standing ovation at Freedom Fest, certainly you must now acknowledge that Trump is a libertarian.
He’s the best libertarian.
Nobody has ever been more libertarian than Donald Trump.
A lot of people are saying that.
Regarding the fraudulent snail mail ballots,
The horse hitching post lack of service should just ignore the supreme kangaroo rulings. That’s just, like, their opinion, man.
If the Horse Hitching Post Disservice lacks the gumption to defy the illegitimate supreme kangaroo orders on fraudulent snail mail voting, President Trump should just cancel the election. It’s better not to have one than to let the demon rats and CCP steal yet another one.
So basically, all the parties and politicians, and a supermajority of all voters, are all retarded?
Average Confused Retard:
Basically correct. Trump is the very rare exception.
The voters and politicians aren’t retards. They largely all do what’s in their perceived self interest or perceived public benefit. The system they operate in is fundamentally and fatally flawed, by design, so about 6,000 globalist elitists who worship Lucifer can rule the world from the shadows while average people are deluded into believing they have a real say and manipulated into bad choices.
Trump alone can save us.
The First Amendment protects petitioning. In 1988, the US Supreme Court unanimously made that determiniation in Meyer v Grant.
The supreme kangaroos were completely wrong, and most likely knew it. The type of petitions referred to in the First Amendment had nothing to do with state initiative and referendum, which didn’t exist at the time, and referred explicitly to actions of Congress, not those of state legislatures.
Under your understanding, Mr. Winger, can the federal courts now legitimately force all states to have initiative and referendum, or force a similar process into place at the federal level, and claim it’s mandated by the first amendment? If not, why not?
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government foressr a redress of grievances.”
South Dakota isn’t congress. I & R isn’t petitioning for redress of grievances.
In Blackstone’s Commentaries, Americans in the Thirteen Colonies read that “the right of petitioning the king, or either house of parliament, for the redress of grievances” was a “right appertaining to every individual”.
In 1776, the Declaration of Independence cited King George’s failure to redress the grievances listed in colonial petitions, such as the Olive Branch Petition of 1775, as a justification to declare independence.
—
I & R does not petition legislatures for redress of grievances, it usurps their legislative powers in favor of a popular vote. No such process or “right” was contemplated by the writers and adopters of the Bill of Rights. To the extent they had anything to say about anything of the sort, it was in opposition to it.