The Current, a Georgia On-Line Periodical, Carries Article on Georgia’s Ballot Access Laws

Posted on by September 26, 2026

The Current, a Georgia on-line periodical centered in Savannah, has this extensive article about Georgia’s severe ballot access laws for candidates who are not Republicans or Democrats.

Comments

The Current, a Georgia On-Line Periodical, Carries Article on Georgia’s Ballot Access Laws — 38 Comments

  2. Richard Winger doesn’t want his readers to know that the US SUPREME COURT saved SAVE voter verification unless they read the comments, or to have a link.to real news coverage of that or anything else from Not The Bee

    How come?.Why, or why not?

  3. “MEANWHILE, REAL NEWS LINKS TO NOT THE BEE ARE STILL, ONCE AGAIN, FAILING TO POST SUCCESSFULLY IN BAN COMMENTS.

    WHY NOT ???”

    Indeed, when so many fake news propaganda links are posted all the time by the AZ SPAMBOT, which are rarely if ever about any of the main issues addressed by the articles at this site in general, much less any given particular article?

  4. As George Orwell pointed out in Animal Farm, not all animals are equal. And, even if they were, the crAZy nAZi AZerbaijani 666 spambot is a computer program and not an animal.

  5. Speaking of not all animals being equal, Supreme Kangaroos…

    what are the chances that they will seriously deliberate whether or not the Trump administration preference for Lindell T.V. over XiCCPNN in White House press conferences and Presidential pool live videotaping and interviews, and other such decisions about which media outlets get what kind of access to limited times, spaces,and personnel constitutes Congress passing a law abridging freedom of the Press?

    Certainly, you can clearly read between the lines on 18th century parchment which particular 21st century fake news organizations are entitled to which particular seats, questions, all access passes, and so on.

    Would they be really supreme kangaroos if they didn’t take those kinds of goofy questions seriously?

  6. Kangaroo,

    Of course the Supreme Kangaroos will take that question seriously. The Supreme Kangaroos and Richard Winger probably agree that fake news propaganda outlets such as those he frequently cites in articles and get linked by the AZ Nazi 566 spambot in comments have a constitutionally mandated protection, unlike real news such as Lindell TV and Not The Bee.

    They may well even rule that “freedom of the press” clearly means that XiNN and PMSCOW, specifically, have an inalienable right to film and broadcast the Tyrant Lincoln bedroom 24/7, particularly when POTUS is GOP.

    After all, the Politicommie fake news outlet, itself one of the recently bounced fake news outlets, reportedly recently reported that the Trump administration is in trouble with kangaroos on legal arguments over those questions, according to the AZ-666 CRAZY NAZI Azeri spambot.

  11. With the White people’s movement always growing in size, how much longer before our people don’t have to hide and compromise? How soon is it until the time when (((they))) can’t get away with treating Whiteness like a crime?

  12. When will the White people of Georgia and other Confederate States who along with whose ancestors have lived here before,during, and ever since that time receive the compensation and accrued compound interest for the illegal federal and UN invasion occupation, property destruction and theft, and all the resulting terrorism, population replacement, crime, welfare, etc., etc that resulted, ever since 1861?

  13. KR & HG

    That would be crazy. The White House, Air Force one , Marine One, presidential motorcade and events are limited access by nature. There can be only so much space and time.

    The number of alleged news organizations is unlimited. The space and time are limited. How can the Bull of Rights or courts mandate which news or “news” organizations get what kind of access?

    Maybe it takes a White male human brain, the only kind capable of logical thought,to understand such super simple things?

  14. Logic doesn’t govern kangaroo decisions, much less the actual text or intent of any constitution.

    They twist both on purpose continuously into knots and play a game of telephone known as precedent to intentionally twist both to achieve their desired outcomes.

  17. Yes. Very soon. It will be the final battle as foretold in the book of Revelation and in the very exceedingly excellent Liberator antityrant Trump ad funded at an excellent bargain value by all patriotic Americans and enjoyed by every one of them as well. In your face, XiNN AND NAZI 666 SPAMBOT !!!

  18. “We will cast out the communists, Marxists, and fascists. We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country. We will rout the fake news media, and we will liberate America from these villains once and for all,” Trump said it. I believe it. That settles it.

  19. Trump also recently said he would be the greatest communist in history. I don’t always believe everything President Trump says, but I definitely believe him on that. In fact, I think he already is, even if he’s not allowed to or can’t bring himself to say it openly yet.

    He’s in love with Kim Jong Un and doing more for Communist causes and support than any past POTUS, and that’s good enough for now.

  23. While President Trump did not specifically say which communist party he would be affiliated if he was the greatest communist, would that be relevant as an article here, given that we have various communist and socialist minor parties seeking and getting ballot access in the USA, and given President Trump’s association with capitalist US minor parties such as the Reform Party in 2000, the Libertarian Party in 2024, and the open speculation he encouraged about starting a Patriot Party in 2021, as well as his known encouragement of major-minor parties in other countries such as the Reform Party UK and AfD in Germany, etc?

  26. Text:

    “Blue Wave” or Not, Expect Business as Usual After the Midterms

    Thomas L. Knapp 1

    “What I want you to do,” US president told a South Carolina rally audience in August, ” is pretend, please, that I’m on the ballot” when it’s time to vote in the 2026 midterm election for US House and Senate seats. He repeated the request multiple times in various venues.

    Republican candidates likely hope that voters weren’t listening. As of late September, Trump’s approval rating stood at 29 percent according to an American Research Group poll. Republican candidates are distancing themselves from him, scrubbing references to his endorsements of them from their web sites, and in some cases performatively coming out against him on various issues.

    All year we’ve heard predictions of a “blue wave” in the midterms, with Democrats taking majorities in both houses of Congress.

    As of this writing, most forecasts I’ve consulted say that there’s a good chance of a Democratic House come January, but that the Republicans will likely hang on to the Senate.

    My own forecast is “don’t get your hopes up for substantial change no matter how the midterms turn out.” That’s just not how American government works. Or at least that’s not how American government USUALLY works.

    “Americans like to think of themselves as uncompromising,” historian Shelby Foote noted in Ken Burns’s 1990 documentary The Civil War. “Our true genius is for compromise. Our whole government’s founded on it. And, it failed,” leading to southern secession and four years of brutal war.

    While the conventional wisdom holds that America is politically “polarized,” its two major political parties have converged over the last few decades.

    They’ll quibble over the details, but they pride themselves on compromising where big issues are concerned. Their joint raison d’être is to keep the jalopy of government moving down the same road, in the same direction, no matter the cost.

    Seldom a month goes by that we’re not told of negotiations on some “must-pass” bill, saved at the last minute when a handful of members from one party “cross the aisle” to put a little more gas in the jalopy’s tank or a plug in one of the jalopy’s flat tires.

    In fact, it’s kind of silly to pretend that the two major parties are separate parties. Since the 1890s, when they seized control of elections with “ballot access” laws to exclude competitors, they’ve effectively become feuding factions of a single political party whose mutual hatred of each other is largely fueled by what Freud called “the narcissism of small differences.”

    And over the last 50 years or so, the party factions in Congress have painted themselves into the corner of servitude to an increasingly imperial and unbridled presidency. Trump may be the most predatory example, but he’s hardly sui generis. He’s just an extension of a long-term trend.

    The Democrats aren’t going to secure veto-proof majorities in both houses of Congress … and even if they did, it’s not obvious they’d make any foundational changes to how American government works.

    They’d keep spending more and more money.

    They’d keep borrowing more and more money to spend.

    They’d keep sticking their noses into every corner of our personal lives and our businesses’ operations.

    They’d keep kicking the Social Security can down the road toward insolvency.

    Sure, they might impeach and remove a president, but the next president and the president after that would continue down the same road with, largely, complete congressional cooperation — and with a free hand to engage in foreign military adventures despite the Constitution’s assignment of war powers to Congress.

    The problem isn’t which party controls the House, the Senate, or the White House, or appoints the most Supreme Court justices.

    The problem is political government itself. The framers of the US Constitution hoped to bequeath us a system which wouldn’t devolve into tyranny, but that hope was obviously in vain. George III ruled his American colonies with a much lighter touch than we’ve enjoyed from the US government since the revolution.

    For all his failings, Abraham Lincoln got it right when he pointed out that “no man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.”

    When we go back to the drawing board, as eventually we must, that should be written across the top as our starting point.

  28. I’m not Knapp and who is “we”? Is “we” a royal? Suffering from multiple personality disorder? How would “we” know what other people care about? Maybe “we” should go away, wee “we”?

  30. He seems like a good writer to me. I’m not Knapp, or any kinda writer, good or bad.

    Why is wee “we” obsessed with gayness? Speaking for others, if not a royal or suffering from multiple personalities?

    Wee “we” problems?

  32. AG Blanche says President has right to restrict access to White House and Air Force One

    LOL. And here I was thinking anyone could just get on board Air Force One or enter any part of the White House any time they want. Doh!

  33. Not everyone. Just certain particular fake news outlets that are listed in the First Amendment according to themselves, their attorneys, the AZ SPAMBOT, and possibly some kangaroos, supreme or other.

  34. A porn parody of this site’s comments would be retard fetish porn.

    Would a porn parody of wee “we” wee-wee be wee wee wee-wee gay retard fetish porn?

  36. Bob is Knapp and as is “Knapp is a loser.” He hates himself, yet he needs attention.

  38. No, but even though you quit going to therapy, you could probably imitate my diagnoses and advice because of the work we already did.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.