On October 1, the Eighth Circuit decided to rehear Dakotans for Health v Johnson, 25-2940. This is the lawsuit in which the Eighth Circuit had struck down the February petition deadline for initiatives in South Dakota. The original vote had been 2-1. Now all the full-time judges of the Eighth Circuit will rehear the case.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/09/announcing-our-first-scotus-forecast-contest/
PREDICT SCOTUS CASE RESULTS
ESP FOR BAN TYRANT TRUMP TROLL MORONS
MORE GAMBLING THAN EVER ???
Why is the AZ 666 SPAMBOT programmed to talk to itaelf, and in the plural, artificially hallucinating that it is multiple trolls trolling about an imaginary tyrant Trump, rather than just one computer program, programmed to emulate the ultimate moron, especially but not only on that subject?
Good. Hopefully they will arrive at a different result. It didn’t belong in federal courts to begin with.
The prior court decisions that invent a First Amendment federal right to state initiatives is hot garbage. Those didn’t exist until over a century later.
If such a right existed, could federal courts force states that don’t already have initiatives to start running them?
The petitions referred to in the first amendment were entirely different, directed to congress, not supplanting state legislative functions.
PART OF DOI 4 JULY 1776
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
—
2025 -2029 NEW TYRANT IN DEVIL CITY
Yeah, that has nothing to do with state initiatives, as Stanley explained. And the spambot miscalculated the years after the quote. The correct mathematical calculations is 2021-2025, when POTUS was a red Chinese quisling mentally incompetent puppet. Thank God they weren’t able to steal the following presidential election, and pray they won’t steal the next.