On Monday, September 17, U.S. District Court Judge Edmund Sargus, a Clinton appointee, will hear Schmitt v Husted, s.d., 2:18cv-966. This is the case over whether Ohio election officials have the power to decide on their own that they will not put an initiative on the ballot because they feel the subject matter is inappropriate for an initiative. The case arose when Portage County officials rejected an initiative relating to marijuana. Portage County can’t print its ballots until this case is settled.
Here is the final brief in the case, filed by the plaintiffs in response to the government’s brief.
Subject matter is or is NOT within the legislative jurisdiction of the regime.
See the book –
Sources of Our Liberties, edit by Richard l. Perry (ABA 1959)
— legis history of USA Const Amdts 1-8, esp the index.
Book is now on Internet – expired copyright.
Limits on the monarch/oligarch HACKS.
The Mass regime has advisory questions on ballots.