Ballot Access News
December 2020 – Volume 36, Number 7
This issue was printed on white paper. |
Table of Contents
- ALASKA VOTERS PASS RANKED CHOICE VOTING BUT SIMULTANEOUSLY INJURE BALLOT ACCESS
- MASSACHUSETTS RANKED CHOICE VOTING LOSES
- PUERTO RICO
- BOOK REVIEW: THE BEST CANDIDATE
- FLORIDA TOP-TWO INITIATIVE LOSES
- COLORADO NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE
- MAINE RANKED CHOICE
- ORDER OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ON THE BALLOT 2020
- 2020 PRESIDENTIAL VOTE (NOT FINAL!)
- 2022 PETITIONING FOR STATEWIDE OFFICE
- MINOR PARTY AND INDEPENDENTS WIN TWENTY-FIVE LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS
- VOTER REGISTRATION CHART IN NOVEMBER 2020 ISSUE
- SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL
ALASKA VOTERS PASS RANKED CHOICE VOTING BUT SIMULTANEOUSLY INJURE BALLOT ACCESS
On November 3, Alaska voters passed Measure Two with 50.55% of the vote. It converts elections for partisan office, including president, to ranked choice voting. Unfortunately it also vastly stiffens the definition of a "qualified party". And it restricts the November ballot for congress and partisan state office to only the top four vote-getters in the primary. Past election returns indicate that for elections for Governor and Congress, this will mean only Republicans and Democrats qualify for the November ballot.
Political Party Definition
The old Alaska law lets a group become a qualified party, or keep its party status, two ways. Measure twoeliminates the easier way.
The old law’s easier method for qualifying a party was a vote test of 3%, which only applied to Governor in gubernatorial years. In presidential years, it only applied to U.S. Senate. If there was no U.S. Senate race, then it applied to U.S. House. Although this was a difficult test, the Libertarian Party and the Green Party had each polled 3%, for one of those offices, seven times in the past.
The Libertarian Party polled over 3% for Governor in 1982 and 2014; for U.S. Senate in 2014 and 2016; for U.S. House in 2012, 2014, and 2016. The Green Party polled over 3% for Governor in 1998; for U.S. Senate in 1996, 1998, and 2002; and for U.S. House in 2000, 2002, and 2004.
The other way to qualify was to have registration membership of at least 3% of the last vote cast, which is approximately 2% of the registration total. That method is so difficult, there is no party in any state in the U.S. that meets it, except for Democratic and Republican Parties, and parties that have "Independent" or "Independence" in their names.
Yet that is the only remaining method for a party to have qualified status.
Qualified status is important, because (1) it allows a party to be on the ballot for President with no petition; (2) it allows the party to be listed on the voter registration as a choice.
It is a paradox that the Libertarian Party polled its fifth-highest percentage of the presidential vote in Alaska in 2020, and yet Alaska is one of only 19 states in which the party is not ballot-qualified for any office.
Alaska does have a separate category of qualified party, a "Limited Political Party", which is only ballot-qualified for president. Measure Two did not affect that. But the "Limited Political Party" law is deeply flawed. The Libertarian Party polled 6.05% for President in 2016, yet that showing did not give the party status as a "Limited Political Party" for 2020, because of the peculiar way in which it is written.
Top-Four Exclusionary Effect
Measure Two also injures ballot access for minor parties by providing no means for a candidate to be on the ballot for Congress or partisan state office unless the candidate places in the top four in the primary. The primary does not use ranked choice voting.
For Governor and Congress, invariably there are at least four candidates running in the major party primaries. One must go all the way back to 2002 to find any Alaska primary for statewide office with fewer than four candidates seeking the Democratic or Republican nomination. Assuming that holds true in the future, it is likely that all four of the general election candidates will be Republicans and Democrats, leaving no room for members of other parties.
Here are the number of candidates seeking the Republican and Democratic nominations for statewide office in past primaries, back to 1996:
YEAR |
OFFICE |
REP |
DEM |
2020 |
Senate |
1 |
3 |
2020 |
House |
3 |
3 |
2018 |
Governor |
7 |
1 |
2018 |
House |
3 |
4 |
2016 |
Senate |
4 |
2 |
2016 |
House |
4 |
3 |
2014 |
Governor |
4 |
2 |
2014 |
Senate |
4 |
2 |
2014 |
House |
4 |
2 |
2012 |
House |
3 |
6 |
2010 |
Governor |
6 |
2 |
2010 |
Senate |
2 |
3 |
2010 |
House |
3 |
1 |
2008 |
Senate |
7 |
3 |
2008 |
House |
3 |
2 |
2006 |
Governor |
5 |
3 |
2006 |
House |
1 |
4 |
2004 |
Senate |
4 |
3 |
2004 |
House |
1 |
3 |
2002 |
Governor |
4 |
3 |
2002 |
Senate |
2 |
2 |
2002 |
House |
1 |
2 |
2000 |
House |
1 |
3 |
1998 |
Governor |
3 |
3 |
1998 |
Senate |
2 |
2 |
1998 |
House |
2 |
2 |
1996 |
Senate |
3 |
7 |
1996 |
House |
3 |
1 |
Efforts will be made to persuade the legislature to alter the definition of a qualified political party. The organizations that backed Measure Two may assist. They did not intend to make the definition of a party more difficult; they were just thoughtless when they drafted the measure.
MASSACHUSETTS RANKED CHOICE VOTING LOSES
Massachusetts Question Two, for ranked choice voting for congress and state office, lost 45.2%-54.8%. The measure might have passed without the health crisis. It was difficult to organize a campaign when large public meetings, and door-to-door canvassing, were impossible.
Also, voters are most interested in RCV when there have been recent instances of no one receiving at least 50% of the vote for an important office. Maine voters enacted RCV in 2016 after having seen no one win a majority for Governor in each of the two preceding gubernatorial elections. But nothing like that had happened in Massachusetts since the 2014 gubernatorial election, six years ago.
One-third of all U.S. House elections in Massachusetts in the past fifty years have had only one candidate on the ballot; and about three-fourths of all legislative elections only have one candidate on the ballot. It would have been better if the restrictive ballot access laws of Massachusetts had been eased before an RCV initiative was attempted.
PUERTO RICO
On November 3, Puerto Rico voters voted on statehood. The vote was: yes 536,556 (52.29%); no 489,677 (47.71%). Congress could admit Puerto Rico with a bill, which would only need a majority in each house of Congress.
The turnout in the election was 51%. The same ballot also had gubernatorial and legislative elections.
BOOK REVIEW: THE BEST CANDIDATE
The Best Candidate: Presidential Nomination in Polarized Times, edited by Eugene D. Mazo and Michael R. Dimino. 408 pages, 2020, Cambridge University Press.
Law professors and others each contributed a chapter about the U.S. presidential nomination process. The resulting seventeen chapters provide a wealth of detail about the flaws, problems and controversies concerned with the process.
Many of the characteristics of the system were not planned by anyone. The emergence of presidential primaries in almost every state, starting in 1972, is often attributed to the McGovern-Fraser Commission, set up by the Democratic National Committee. But the book reveals that the Commission never intended to replace caucuses with primaries. It only wanted to make the caucuses more democratic. But it was deemed so complicated to do that, that state legislatures and party leaders threw up their hands and switched to primaries. By 2020, there were only four states with old-fashioned caucuses.
It is also an accident that Iowa and New Hampshire ended up being first on the calendar. One of the chapters gives the story of how that happened, and discusses the injustice that the voters of two states have such power.
One of the chapters, "Constitutional Law and the Presidential Nomination Process" gives a very useful account of all the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions about the extent to which parties have a right to set the rules for their own nominations.
Two chapters cover the strange history of public funding for presidential primaries, or other aspects of federal campaign finance law. Another chapter covers the issue of whether there should be a single presidential primary day for the entire nation. Yet another chapter discusses the issue of whether state laws should give parties complete control over which candidates qualify for presidential primary ballots.
A chapter discusses the extent to which delegates should be bound. One chapter covers debates. Yet another chapter traces how new technology has altered campaigns. If you are interested in these topics, this book belongs on your bookshelf.
FLORIDA TOP-TWO INITIATIVE LOSES
Florida voters defeated the top-two initiative, Amendment Three. Florida initiatives can’t pass unless they receive 60%. The "yes" vote was 57.03%. There were six initiatives on the ballot, and only two of them failed to pass.
This is the fifth time a statewide top-two measure has failed to pass. The others were California 2004, Arizona 2012, South Dakota 2016, and twice in Oregon, 2014 and 2008. Top-two has won twice, in California in 2010 and Washington in 2004.
The League of Women Voters deserves credit for helping to defeat the Florida measure. Although the League had endorsed open primaries in 2019, at the time it determined that a traditional open primary is superior to top-two. In a traditional open primary, parties have nominees and their own primary ballots,, but any voter is free to choose any party’s primary ballot. The League still endorsed Amendment Three, but in August 2020 it changed its mind and urged that it be defeated.
COLORADO NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE
Colorado voters were asked if they want to repeal their state’s support for the National Popular Vote Compact. The results: 52.33% voted to keep Colorado in the compact.
MAINE RANKED CHOICE
Maine was the first state to use ranked choice voting for president in a general election this year. Oddly, though, President Trump got over 50% in the northern district, and Joe Biden got over 50% in the southern district, so Maine didn’t need to count second-choice votes.
ORDER OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ON THE BALLOT 2020
Ala. |
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Ariz. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Colo. |
Biden |
Trump |
Blankn |
Hamm |
Hawkin |
Huber |
Jorgen |
Carroll |
Charls |
Collins |
DeLaF |
Hunter |
Conn. |
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Del. |
Biden |
Trump |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
D.C. |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
Biden |
La Riva |
Trump |
Pierce |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Fla. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
DeLaF |
LaRiva |
Hawkin |
Blankn |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Ga. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Hi. |
Biden |
Blankn |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Pierce |
Trump |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Ill. |
Biden |
Trump |
Hawkin |
LaRiva |
Carroll |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Ind. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Iowa |
Trump |
Biden |
DeLaF |
Blankn |
King |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Pierce |
West |
~ | ~ | ~ |
Ky. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
West |
Pierce |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
La. |
Biden |
Jorgen |
Trump |
Carroll |
Simmon |
Boddie |
Blankn |
Pierce |
Hoefl |
LaRiva |
Kendy |
West |
Me. |
Biden |
DeLaF |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Trump |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Md. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
Segal |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Mass. |
Biden |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Trump |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Mich. |
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
Blankn |
Hawkin |
DeLaF |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Miss. |
Biden |
Trump |
Blankn |
Carroll |
Collins |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Pierce |
West |
~ | ~ | ~ |
Mo. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
Blankn |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Nev. |
Biden |
Blankn |
Jorgen |
Trump |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
N.M. |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Biden |
Tittle |
Trump |
LaRiva |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
N.Y. |
Biden |
Trump |
Trump |
Biden |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Pierce |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
No.C. |
Trump |
Biden |
Blankn |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Okla. |
Trump |
Jorgen |
Biden |
Simmon |
West |
Pierce |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Ore. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
Hunter |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Pa. |
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
R.I. |
Trump |
Biden |
DeLaF |
Carroll |
LaRiva |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
So.C. |
Hawkin |
Trump |
DeLaF |
Jorgen |
Biden |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
So.D. |
Trump |
Jorgen |
Biden |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Tenn. |
Trump |
Biden |
Blankn |
DeLaF |
Hawkin |
Jorgen |
Kendy |
LaRiva |
West |
~ | ~ | ~ |
Tex. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Utah |
Pierce |
West |
Biden |
Blankn |
Jorgen |
McHugh |
Hawkin |
LaRiva |
Trump |
~ | ~ | ~ |
Vt. |
Biden |
Blankn |
Carroll |
Collins |
DeLaF |
Duncan |
Hawkin |
Huber |
Jorgen |
Kendy |
Kopit |
LaFon |
Va. |
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
Wa. |
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
LaRiva |
Kendy |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
W.V. |
Trump |
Biden |
Jorgen |
Hawkin |
~ | |||||||
Wis. |
Biden |
Trump |
Blankn |
Jorgen |
Carroll |
~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
States not named above either rotate names, or let each county decide. Arkansas and New Jersey let each county decide ballot order. Illinois and Iowa, which are listed above, rotate the order of the qualified parties but put others on the ballot in the order in which they filed their petitions.
States that rotate all candidates are Alaska, California, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio and Wyoming. Although New Hampshire rotates each party column, only the Republican and Democratic Parties have their own column; all others are squeezed into a third column, and names inside that third column are not rotated.
Colorado, Louisiana, and Vermont each had more than twelve columns, so not everyone fits. The Colorado candidates not listed above were on in this order: Princess Jacob-Fambro, Alyson Kennedy, Joseph Kishore, Kyle Kopitke, Gloria La Riva, Joe McHugh, Brock Pierce, Jordan Scott, and Kanye West. In Vermont, La Riva, McCormic, H. Brooke Paige, Brock Pierce, Zachary Scalf, Jerome Segal, Gary Swing, Donald Trump, and Kanye West. Louisiana: Bill Hammons.
Abbreviations include "Trmp" for Trump, "Jorgen" for Jorgensen, "Kendy" for Kennedy; "Blankn" for Blankenship.
2020 PRESIDENTIAL VOTE (NOT FINAL!)
Biden |
Trump |
Jorgen |
Hawkins |
De La Fuente |
La Riva |
Kanye W. |
Blanknship |
Pierce |
|
Al |
849,624 |
1,441,170 |
25,176 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Ak |
153,502 |
189,543 |
8,877 |
? |
317 |
? |
? |
1,120 |
822 |
Az |
1,672,143 |
1,661,686 |
51,465 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Ar |
423,618 |
759,770 |
13,130 |
2,957 |
1,320 |
1,335 |
4,096 |
2,078 |
2,138 |
Ca |
11,020,427 |
5,935,537 |
185,503 |
80,026 |
59,240 |
50,246 |
? |
? |
? |
Co |
1,803,877 |
1,364,194 |
52,427 |
8,981 |
636 |
1,035 |
8,080 |
5,060 |
572 |
Ct |
1,080,680 |
715,291 |
20,227 |
7,538 |
13 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
De |
296,268 |
200,603 |
5,000 |
2,139 |
? |
14 |
169 |
? |
5 |
DC |
317,323 |
18,586 |
2,036 |
1,726 |
? |
855 |
? |
? |
693 |
Fl |
5,297,045 |
5,668,731 |
70,324 |
14,721 |
5,966 |
5,712 |
? |
3,902 |
? |
Ga |
2,474,507 |
2,461,837 |
62,138 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Hi |
365,802 |
196,602 |
5,525 |
3,814 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
930 |
1,181 |
Id |
287,021 |
554,119 |
16,404 |
? |
1,491 |
? |
3,632 |
1,886 |
2,808 |
Il |
3,457,175 |
2,436,582 |
65,982 |
30,239 |
? |
7,964 |
? |
? |
? |
In |
1,242,413 |
1,729,516 |
59,232 |
988 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Ia |
759,061 |
897,672 |
19,637 |
3,075 |
1,082 |
? |
3,210 |
1,707 |
544 |
Ks |
551,144 |
752,903 |
29,466 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Ky |
772,474 |
1,326,646 |
26,234 |
716 |
? |
98 |
6,483 |
? |
3,599 |
La |
856,034 |
1,255,776 |
21,645 |
0 |
0 |
987 |
4,897 |
860 |
749 |
Me |
430,023 |
359,502 |
14,176 |
8,234 |
1,382 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Md |
1,977,996 |
974,606 |
33,406 |
15,698 |
22 |
55 |
582 |
? |
11 |
Ma |
2,331,327 |
1,152,871 |
45,995 |
18,294 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Mi |
2,804,040 |
2,649,852 |
60,381 |
13,718 |
2,986 |
? |
? |
7,235 |
? |
Mn |
1,717,049 |
1,484,048 |
34,976 |
10,034 |
5,611 |
1,210 |
7,939 |
? |
5,651 |
Ms |
539,494 |
756,731 |
8,025 |
1,498 |
? |
? |
3,639 |
1,279 |
659 |
Mo |
1,252,873 |
1,718,245 |
41,267 |
8,281 |
? |
? |
? |
3,918 |
? |
Mt |
244,786 |
343,602 |
15,252 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Ne |
374,583 |
556,846 |
20,283 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Nv |
703,486 |
669,890 |
14,783 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,138 |
0 |
NH |
424,921 |
365,654 |
13,235 |
217 |
? |
? |
82 |
? |
? |
NJ |
2,608,258 |
1,883,242 |
31,677 |
14,202 |
2,728 |
2,928 |
? |
2,954 |
? |
NM |
501,614 |
401,894 |
12,585 |
4,426 |
? |
1,640 |
? |
? |
? |
NY |
4,049,252 |
2,976,923 |
52,098 |
25,706 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
19,574 |
NC |
2,684,292 |
2,758,775 |
48,678 |
12,195 |
? |
? |
? |
7,549 |
? |
ND. |
114,902 |
235,595 |
9,393 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Oh |
2,678,528 |
3,153,751 |
67,534 |
18,807 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Ok |
503,890 |
1,020,280 |
24,731 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5,597 |
? |
2,547 |
Or |
1,323,113 |
938,616 |
40,662 |
11,655 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Pa |
3,459,246 |
3,378,197 |
79,416 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
RI |
306,192 |
199,830 |
5,047 |
? |
923 |
843 |
? |
? |
? |
SC |
1,091,541 |
1,385,103 |
27,916 |
6,907 |
1,862 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SD |
150,471 |
261,043 |
11,095 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Tn. |
1,139,289 |
1,849,467 |
29,806 |
4,532 |
1,836 |
2,294 |
10,256 |
5,350 |
? |
Tx |
5,259,120 |
5,890,333 |
126,241 |
33,396 |
? |
350 |
? |
? |
? |
Ut |
560,282 |
865,140 |
38,447 |
5,053 |
? |
1,139 |
7,213 |
5,551 |
2,623 |
Vt |
242,820 |
112,704 |
3,608 |
1,310 |
48 |
166 |
1,269 |
208 |
100 |
Va |
2,413,568 |
1,962,430 |
64,761 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Wa |
2,367,252 |
1,582,560 |
80,327 |
18,234 |
? |
4,826 |
? |
? |
? |
WV |
235,870 |
545,143 |
10,678 |
2,598 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Wi |
1,630,673 |
1,610,065 |
38,491 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
5,144 |
? |
Wy |
73,491 |
193,559 |
5,768 |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
2,208 |
~ |
79,874,380 |
73,803,261 |
1,851,166 |
391,915 |
87,463 |
83,697 |
67,144 |
59,869 |
46,484 |
2022 PETITIONING FOR STATEWIDE OFFICE
State
|
Requirements
|
Signatures or Registrations Obtained
|
||||||
Full Party
|
Cand.
|
Lib’t
|
Green
|
Consti
|
Wk. Fam.
|
Alliance
|
Marijuana
|
|
Ala. |
51,588 |
51,588 |
2,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Alaska |
(reg) 10,821 |
pay fee |
6,958 |
1,540 |
629 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
Ariz. |
31,686 |
(est) #40,670 |
already on |
3,900 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Ark. |
10,000 |
10,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Calif. |
(es) (reg) 72,395 |
65 + fee |
already on |
already on |
211 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Colo. |
(reg) 1,000 |
#8,000 |
already on |
already on |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conn. |
no procedure |
#7,500 |
already on |
already on |
can’t start |
already on |
already on |
can’t start |
Del. |
(est.) (reg) 750 |
(est.) 7,500 |
already on |
716 |
270 |
347 |
672 |
0 |
D.C. |
no procedure |
#3,000 |
already on |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Florida |
0 |
pay fee |
already on |
already on |
already on |
0 |
already on |
0 |
Georgia |
72,336 |
#64,354 |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Hawaii |
833 |
25 |
already on |
already on |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Idaho |
17,348 |
1,000 |
already on |
can’t start |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Illinois |
no procedure |
#25,000 |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Indiana |
no procedure |
#44,935 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Iowa |
no procedure |
#1,500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Kansas |
16,714 |
5,000 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Ky. |
no procedure |
#5,000 |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
La. |
(reg) 1,000 |
#pay fee |
already on |
already on |
267 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Maine |
in court |
#4,000 |
in court |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Md. |
10,000 |
10,000 |
already on |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mass. |
(est) (reg) 45,500 |
#10,000 |
(rg) 19,097 |
(reg) 3,793 |
(reg) 307 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
Mich. |
42,506 |
30,000 |
already on |
already on |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Minn. |
(est) 165,000 |
#2,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
already on |
Miss. |
be organized |
1,000 |
already on |
already on |
already on |
0 |
already on |
0 |
Mo. |
10,000 |
10,000 |
already on |
0 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mont. |
5,000 |
#16,959 |
already on |
in court |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nebr. |
6,980 |
4,000 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
finished |
Nev. |
13,557 |
250 |
already on |
(reg) 1,578 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N. Hamp. |
23,798 |
#3,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N.J. |
no procedure |
#800 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N. M. |
3,483 |
10,260 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N.Y. |
no procedure |
#45,000 |
in court |
in court |
can’t start |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
No. Car. |
13,757 |
(est) 110,000 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No. Dak. |
7,000 |
1,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Ohio |
57,630 |
5,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Okla. |
35,592 |
pay fee |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Oregon |
27,960 |
23,737 |
already on |
already on |
already on |
already on |
0 |
0 |
Penn. |
no procedure |
5,000 |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
R.I. |
18,758 |
#1,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
So. Car. |
10,000 |
10,000 |
already on |
already on |
already on |
already on |
already on |
0 |
So. Dak. |
3,393 |
3,393 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Tenn. |
56,083 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Texas |
83,435 |
83,435 |
already on |
already on |
in court |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Utah |
2,000 |
#1,000 |
already on |
0 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Vermont |
be organized |
#500 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
already on |
0 |
0 |
Virginia |
no procedure |
#10,000 |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
0 |
0 |
Wash. |
no procedure |
#pay fee |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
West Va. |
no procedure |
#7,610 |
already on |
already on |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Wisc. |
10,000 |
#2,000 |
already on |
can’t start |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
Wyo. |
5,418 |
5,418 |
already on |
can’t start |
already on |
can’t start |
can’t start |
can’t start |
States On |
32
|
15
|
13
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
#partisan label permitted. "WK FAM" = Working Families. MARIJUANA = Legal Marijuana Now. "(reg.) = registered members. Four years ago at this time, the Libertarians were on in 38 states; Green in 21; Constitution in 13; Working Families in 5.
MINOR PARTY AND INDEPENDENTS WIN TWENTY-FIVE LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS
At the November 2020 election, 25 minor party or independent legislative candidates were elected. An "independent" is someone who was on the ballot as an independent, regardless of how he or she is registered.
Alaska: two independents for the State House, Daniel Ortiz of Ketchikan and Josiah Patkotak of Barrow.
California: one independent for Assembly, Chad Mayes. This is the first time someone other than a Democrat or a Republican has won in a top-two state.
Maine: four independent representatives: Walter Riseman of Harrison, Jeffrey Evangelos of Friendship, William Pluecker of Warren, and Sophia Warren of Scarborough.
Massachusetts: one independent representative, Sussanah Whipps of Athol.
New Mexico: one independent representative, Aileene Barreras of Albuquerque. She is the first independent in the history of the New Mexico legislature.
New York: one independent for Assembly, Rebecca Seawright. She is the first person to be elected to the New York legislature who was not the nominee of a qualified party since 1970. Her partisan label was "Rise and Unite."
Vermont: the Progressive Party elected two State Senators, Christopher Pearson and Anthony Pollina. It elected seven representatives: Emma Mulvaney-Stanak, Brian Cima, Selene Colburn, Taylor Small, Tanya Vyhovsky, Mollie S. Burke, and Heather Suprenant.
Also in Vermont, five independent representatives won: Terry Norris of Shoreham, Paul Lefebvre of Island Pond, Barbara Smith Murphy of Fairfax, Laura Sibilia of Dover, and Kally Pajala of Londonderry.
Wyoming: the Libertarian Party elected a state representative, Marshall Burt. This is the first legislative election the party has won in any state since 2000. Also another Wyoming Libertarian nominee for state representative, Bethany Baldes, lost by only 32 votes.
Also in Wyoming, independent representative Jim Rosco of Teton County was re-elected.
VOTER REGISTRATION CHART IN NOVEMBER 2020 ISSUE
The voter registration chart in the November 2020 B.A.N. did not have enough room to show a breakdown of the "other" minor parties (the parties that did not have their own column). Here is the data:
Alaska: Alaskan Independence 18,458, Veterans 1,282, Alliance 15. California: American Independent 616,584, Peace & Freedom 99,983; Common Sense 9,913; California National 448. Colorado: Unity 2,432, Approval Voting 2,381. Connecticut: Independent Party. Delaware: Independent Party 8,156, American Delta 696, Socialist Workers 121. Florida: Independent Party 163,406, Socialism & Liberation 1,157, Ecology 915. Kentucky: Socialist Workers. Louisiana: Independent Party. Maryland: Working Class 1,469, Bread & Roses 1,003. Massachusetts: Socialist 1,247, United Independent 21,462, Prohibition 16. New Jersey: Conservative 16,253, Natural Law 6,928, Socialist 7,699. New Mexico: Better for America 3,854, Independent American 4,749. New York: Independence 432,943, Conservative 147,606, SAM 348, Women’s Equality 7,207. Oregon: Independent Party 130,668, Progressive 2,734. Utah: Independent American 53,375, United Utah 1,961.
Note that these are figures that were correct in October. All of the figures from the November 2020 were from October at the latest. Some states have tallies every month, so there is even newer data for those states, but the purpose of this paragraph is to complete the November 2020 B.A.N.
The paper edition of the November 2020 B.A.N. had incorrect percentages at the bottom of the columns. Also the national totals for the Green, Constitution, Working Families, Reform, and "other" parties were wrong. The correct data is shown on-line at ballot-access.org. Use the link to past print issues (on the upper right) and choose the November 2020 issue.
SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL
If you use Paypal, you can subscribe to B.A.N., or renew, with Paypal. If you use a credit card in connection with Paypal, use richardwinger@yahoo.com. If you don’t use a credit card in conjunction with Paypal, use richardwinger@yahoo.com.
Ballot Access News is published by and copyright by Richard Winger. Note: subscriptions are available!
Go back to the index.
Copyright © 2020 Ballot Access News
As always, a wealth of information. Thank you RW. I hope you have a successor named in your will.
Re: _The_Best_Candidate_:
IMO, having NH and IO starting the Presidential primaries is good. Ideally, the small states SHOULD go first, because that gives all the candidates a good opportunity for retail campaigning. The mid-sized states should hold the middle primaries to eliminate the also-rans. And, the large states should vote last to deliver the decisive votes to the leaders who are still in the race.
Harry Reid said recently he is determined to change the order of states for 2024, and that he wants Nevada to be first.
So does this include the Dominion spikes in votes for the Presidential election??
Yeah sure —
get another SMALL STATE blow-hard hack to be Prez
now that 70-80 pct of population is in metro areas.
—–
ABOLISH the late DARK AGE super-timebomb minority rule EC and ALL the ROT with It –
esp small State prez primaries in the DEAD of Winter.
NOOOO primaries.
ONE definition of USA voter – USA citizen, 18+ yrs olde, be registered by 28 days before election Days
EQUAL nom pets
PR and APPV
Is a small state blow-hard Prez any worse than a big state blow-hard Prez?
BTW, is Biden the first President from the first state?
Yes, Biden is the first president from Delaware. Most states have never had a president, if one assigns presidents to states in which they were living when they were first elected. States with no president are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida unless one counts Donald Trump, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Herbert Hoover was living in California when he was elected, and Dwight Eisenhower was living in New York when he was elected.
Any New Age quota for Prezs from small/medium/large States YET ???
esp in RED Donkey commie party ???
ANTI-Democracy SMALL States love having min 1 USA Rep, 2 USA Sens and min 3 EC votes.
Causes all sorts of blow-hard machinations in such States.
It’s interesting that 5 of the original 13 states (CT, MD, NC, RI, SC; 6 before Biden) have not elected a resident of their state as President.
CT, DE, and MD had Presidents of the Continental Congress.
https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_%5B121320%5D_v2_%5Bredacted%5D.pdf
MICH – ANTRIM CO
DOMINION MESS – TRUMP LAWYER ITEM.
The Alaska Constitution Party voter registration belongs with the Life and Liberty Party with which it is affiliated. The ACP hasn’t been affiliated with the national CP in over two years. That would be 636 registered voters as of 12/03/2020
The Alaska Constitution Party put Don Blankenship on the November 2020 ballot as its presidential nominee.
No Richard, it did NOT! The National CP petitioned for Limited Political Party status for their candidate. Quit your deceptions on behalf of the CP. It’s tarnishing your reputation.
And suddenly a new contender for biggest site MORON makes his presence known.
JR’s “Life and Liberty” Party is a fantasy on the level of Ogle’s US Parliament. Even abortionist Floyd Whitley wants nothing to do with it. LOL.
Anonymous troll attacks only embolden me. Sounds like a CP hack is upset. Poor, poor, poor CP. Couldn’t fight their way out of a paper bag.
“Well, look, I’m very pro-choice,” Trump said when asked if he would ban partial-birth abortions as president.
“I hate the concept of abortion. I hate it. I hate everything it stands for. I cringe when I listen to people debating the subject. But you still – I just believe in choice.
And, again, it may be a little bit of a New York background, because there is some different attitude in different parts of the country. And, you know, I was raised in New York, and grew up and work and everything else in New York City. But I am strongly for choice and, yet, I hate the concept of abortion.”
When asked again if he would ban partial-birth abortions, Trump said, “No. No, I am very pro-choice in every respect and as far as it goes.” –Newsweek, 1999
Embolden you to do what exactly? To continue to dress up and play politican in a fantasy world like Ogle does?
Conservatives need to unite 100% as Republicans to hold off the communist left which is a threat to liberty.
Houston we have a problem. All of your voter registration numbers from November add up to just under 117 million registrations. There were over 158 million ballots cast in the 2020 election for the two primary presidential runners. That doesn’t even count any of the independence.
Obvious voter fraud
Not all states have registration by party, stop with all the conspiracy nonsense