On March 22, the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Gill v Linnabary, 22-1653. This is the challenge to the petition requirement for independent candidates for U.S. House in Illinois. The law requires a petition of 5% of the last vote cast, except that in years ending with the numeral “two”, the requirement is exactly 5,000 signatures.
The case was filed in 2016 and had a complicated history. The plaintiff-candidate David Gill won injunctive relief in U.S. District Court in 2016, and was ordered on to the ballot. But then the 7th circuit countermanded that relief with a single sentence and no explanation. Then the case went back to the original U.S. District Court Judge to settle the declaratory relief. But then another U.S. District Court Judge had all his criminal cases taken away from him, and because he needed work, many civil cases were transferred to him. He then upheld the 5% requirement, making some factual errors.
Gill appealed, and the Seventh Circuit noted the factual errors, and sent the case back to be re-done. After the previous U.S. District Court judge recused himself, the case was given to a third U.S. District Court Judge, who upheld the requirement. Gill appealed to the Seventh Circuit again. Now, the Seventh Circuit has declared the case moot on the grounds that the district he had wanted to run in back in 2016 no longer exists, due to redistricting. The Seventh Circuit said that part of Gill’s arguments involved the particular characteristics of the district, which didn’t have any real population centers in it, which made petitioning more difficult.
Never before had a constitutional ballot access case been held moot because of intervening redistricting. The Seventh Circuit vacated the U.S. District Court decision, which means the slate on the issue is wiped clean, and a new lawsuit can be filed, and it probably will be. The Seventh Circuit decision is by Judge Michael B. Brennan, and is also signed by Judges Michael Y. Scudder and Amy J. St. Eve, all Trump appointees.
The uncontradicted evidence showed that no petitioning candidate for U.S. House in Illinois had managed to complete the 5% petition successfully, if the candidate was challenged, since 1974. In Illinois, unchallenged candidates get on the ballot automatically if the number of signatures they submitted equalls at least 10% of the requirement.
Illinois and Georgia have the two most difficult petition requirements in the nation for U.S. House. They are the only two states with a 5% petition requirement for that office. Although South Carolina also has a 5% petition requirement for U.S. House, the number of signatures is capped at 10,000.
WHEN WILL ALL MINORITY RULE GERRYMANDER REGIMES COPY AL/IL ROT ???
>>> IE — NOOOO THIRD PARTIES / INDES CANDIDATES ON BALLOTS.
Thank God for Trump and Trump appointees!!!
ore and more judges suffer constipation when a ballot access case comes up.
Bad decision.
It is heartbreaking to fight a law for years only to see the case ruled moot.
Does the war against ranked-choice voting fall under the wheelhouse of this site? https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2F2022%2F04%2F28%2Fflorida-tennessee-ban-ranked-choice-voting-despite-citizen-support%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR1AiT3sNafDixVHtOA81Bp-mOLSJeY9kODLMrRwQk0pklZ7fbFnhjtCrHo&h=AT2VtfAYZPTCu46H31UOcWFJLHupOyI6jQXy4tAKeqZBaK6UGp8z4S6eBJnqKw6NzeJij1pBsRw0QkDP-PKEGr8-m6DTH_1AwAtbTkJU4MqjbA4xIdf0cRIBc9Kiv0DruJCldjv9hWv2
Good decision
Voting is moot. What fascist police state?
How do people here understand “fascist” to mean? I don’t think most of you are using it the way I meant it.
“Fascist” nowadays seems to mean authoritarian but not Communist.
SEE MUSSOLINI AND HITLER *** FASCIST *** REGIMES — WITH RESULTING WARS, MASS MURDERS AND DESTRUCTION.
WEAPONS BIZ MADE BIG CASH.
ANY FASCISM WIKI ???
You did not answer the question. Examples are not a full definition.
NOOO SHORTAGE OF DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS OF ALL POLITICAL STUFF —
AIDED BY WIKIS / ENCYCS / POLISCI BOOKS / HISTORY BOOKS / WAR CRIMES TRIALS / THE LAWS / EXEC ORDERS AND JUDIC CASES IN ALL REGIMES / ETC.
I’m not looking for dictionary definition of the term. After all, I defined it. I am looking for how people here understand it, because the context of their usage seems to suggest that they are using it far too broadly to refer to a lot of things which I never intended to include under its umbrella.
Fascism is left wing totalitarianism.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/parents-bill-rights-wins-zero-votes-dems-attack-fascism-extreme-attack-schools
HOW ABOUT PLAIN ENGLISH –
COMMIE NEWS NETWORK ??? — AKA CNN ???
FASCIST NEWS NETWORK ??? — AKA FOX NEWS ???
—
PUBLIC SKOOOLS – MAJOR EARLY COMMIE SCHEME IN EARLY 1800S ??? — WIPING OUT RELIGION SKOOOLS ???
CNN and Fox are both way too far left, but CNN is worse.