Hearing for Tennessee Ballot Access Bill Postponed for One Day

The Tennessee Senate Local Government Committee had been set to hear SB 2189 on Tuesday, March 22. However the hearing has been postponed until Wednesday, March 23. This is the bill to ease the petition needed for new party recognition.

An identical bill in the House lost on the House floor last week, by only two votes. More representatives voted for it than against it, but abstentions count as “no” votes, and 15 representatives didn’t vote. If the Senate bill passes, that bill could be brought up in the House later.

Article Shows How Minor Party and Independent Candidates in Iowa This Year Have Almost Disappeared

Bleeding Heartland has this very comprehensive article about Iowa ballot access laws. In 2019 and again in 2021, the legislature changed the laws to make them more severe. As a result, the number of candidates running this year, who are not Democrats or Republicans, is much smaller. The article correctly points out that the 2019 lawsuit has been in front of a federal judge for an entire year (since the briefs were filed), and the judge still has not ruled.

Illinois News Stories Point Out Large Share of One-Candidate Legislative Elections

Several Illinois news stories have recently pointed out the large share of state legislative elections with only one candidate running. The paucity of candidates is due to the restrictive Illinois ballot access laws, both in the general election and also, to a lesser extent, in primary elections.

Here is an article from Capitol Fax.

There is also a front-page story in the March 21 issue of the Journal Register, the Springfield daily newspaper, but it is behind a pay wall. It is titled, “One in Five Voters May not have a Say in Some Races.” Thanks to Sam Cahnman for this news.

North Carolina Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear its Case on Whether State Courts Can Participate in U.S. House Redistricting

The U.S. Supreme Court has now docketed Moore v Harper, 21-1271. This is the case filed by North Carolina officials over whether Article One of the U.S. Constitution bars state courts from being involved in disputes over U.S. House districts. The state claims that Article One gives all power over federal elections to the state legislature (or to Congress, if Congress wishes to overrule state legislatures). This theory has been rejected in several previous U.S. Supreme Court opinions. Here is the state’s cert petition. Thanks to Thomas Jones for this news.

U.S. District Court Orders Another Round of Briefs in Case on Whether Virginia Must Elect Delegates This Year

On March 21, U.S. District Court Judge David J. Novak, a Trump appointee, held a status conference in Goldman v Northam, e.d., 3:21cv-420. This is the case on whether Virginia must hold elections this year for lower house of the state legislature. The last election for that office was in November 2021, and the state used districts based on the 2010 census. The plaintiff argues that it violates one-person, one-vote to allow members of the lower house to remain in office til January 2024, when they were elected in districts based on the 2010 census.

The judge ordered another round of briefs, to be confined to whether the plaintiff, a voter, has standing. All new briefs will be filed by April 21. This news story says that the judge orally scolded the state for having caused the case (which was filed last year) to move so slowly.