Yet Another Congressional Vote Shows Letting Independents Vote in Primaries Does Not Elect Centrists

Advocates of letting independent voters vote in partisan primaries constantly say that independents are moderates, and letting independents vote in partisan primaries helps elect moderates. Research overwhelmingly rebuts this assumption. Yet another example is the roll call vote of March 9 on HR 6968, to ban oil imports from Russia. It passed with only 17 “no” votes. The “no” votes came from these members of Congress: Andy Biggs (Arizona), Dan Bishop (North Carolina), Lauren Boebert (Colorado), Cori Bush (Missouri), Madison Cawthorn (North Carolina), Scott Des Larlais (Tennessee), Matt Gaetz (Florida), Louis Gohmert (Texas), Paul Gosar (Arizona), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia), Glenn Grothman (Wisconsin), Clay Higgins (Louisiana), Thomas Massie (Kentucky), Ilhan Omar (Minnesota), Bill Posey (Florida), Chip Roy (Texas), and Tom Tiffany (Wisconsin).

Only three of these seventeen are from states with closed primaries. This shows once again that there is no correlation between type of primary, and what kind of person gets elected.

Alabama Libertarian Party Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Case on Access to List of Registered Voters

On March 21, the Alabama Libertarian Party asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case over access to the list of registered voters. Alabama gives a list of the registered voters free to the qualified parties, but it charges $36,000 for an unqualified party, even if that unqualified party is petitioning and obviously needs the list to help it check the validity of its petition.

In 1970, the U.S. Supreme Court summarily affirmed a judgment of a 3-judge U.S. District Court in New York, that if the state gives a free list of the registered voters to the qualified parties, it must give it to unqualified parties who are petitioning. Despite that, and precedents from lower courts outside Alabama that agreed with that principle, the federal courts in Alabama refused to follow the precedent and ruled against the Libertarian Party. Here is the cert petition. The case number hasn’t been assigned yet (the number on the filing is not the case number).

2020 Democratic Nominee for Governor of North Dakota Will Run for State Senate as an Independent

Shelley Lenz, the Democratic Party nominee for Governor of North Dakota in 2020, will run as an independent candidate for the State Senate this year. See this story.

North Dakota has very difficult ballot access for minor party and independent candidates for state legislature. The minor party requirement is so difficult, no minor party nominee for legislature has been able to qualify since 1976. The law does not allow minor parties to nominate for legislature unless approximately 11% of all the primary voters choose the minor party’s primary ballot.

The independent candidate procedures are also difficult. Independents need a petition of 300 signatures, which represents approximately 4% of the number of voters who voted for president in the typical legislative district in 2020. Very few independent candidates for the legislature qualify. In 2018 and also in 2020, only one did so.

Former State Chair of the Washington State Republican Party Will Run for State Senate as an Independent

Chris Vance, who spent most of his adult life in Republican Party leadership positions, will run for State Senate in 2022 as an independent candidate. He will run in the 31st district, and he hopes to defeat the incumbent Republican. Vance was chair of the Republican Party of Washington state for several years starting in 2001. He was also the Republican choice for U.S. Senate in 2016, and he served in the legislature 1990-1994. Here is the wikipedia page about him. He became an independent in 2017.

Alaska Ballot Access Bill Advances

On March 18, the Alaska bill that eases the definition of a qualified party passed the Senate Judiciary Committee. Existing law requires a party to have registration equal to 3% of the last vote cast, which is now 10,821. The bill changes this to exactly 5,000 registered members. The bill also says that after each census (starting with 2030) the number of registered voters will be increased by the percentage at which the state grew since the last census, rounded to the nearest 500. So if the bill becomes law, perhaps starting in 2030 the requirement would increase to 5,500 or 6,000.