Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene Files Federal Lawsuit to Stop Election Officials from Determining if She Meets Qualifications

On April 1, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene filed a federal lawsuit to stop the challenge process that is pending against her. Greene v Raffensperger, n.d. of Georgia, 1:22cv-1294. Georgia election law says any voter may challenge the qualifications of a candidate, and a voter has challenged Greene on the basis of the “insurrection” language of the Fourteenth Amendment, section three. Here is the Complaint. The case is assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama appointee.

This lawsuit is similar to the lawsuit filed by Congressman Madison Cawthorn, who was also challenged by some North Carolina voters. That case is pending in the Fourth Circuit. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the news about the Greene lawsuit.

Montana Newspaper Story Finally Mentions that Green Party is Back on Ballot

Here is a Montana newspaper story about the March 30 federal court settlement that puts the Green Party back on the ballot. This appears to be the first newspaper story in the state on this news. Thanks to Steve Kelly for the link.

UPDATE: here is a second newspaper story, also published on April 2.
Here is another one, also published April 2.

Sarah Palin and Fifty Other Candidates File for June 11 Alaska Primary for U.S. House

Filing has closed for the Alaska special primary for the unexpired U.S. House seat. Sarah Palin and fifty other candidates filed. Here is the list, which includes 23 independents, 17 Republicans, six Democrats, three Libertarians, one member of the Alaskan Independence Party, and one member of the American Independent Party.

Missouri Legislature May Put a Proposed Pro-Political Party Constitutional Amendment on the Ballot

The Missouri legislature is considering a proposed constitutional amendment to preserve the ability of political parties to have nominees. HJR 131, if it passes, will then go on the November 2022 ballot. It would compete with an initiative that eliminates the ability of parties to have nominees, and instead provides for a unitary primary ballot in which the four top vote-getters are the only candidates who can appear on the November ballot.

Here is the text of HJR 131. It says, “The person receiving the greatest number of votes at a primary election as a party candidate for an office shall be the only candidate for that party for the office.”

The measure also outlaws ranked choice voting, by adding this sentence to the Constitution: “Voters shall only cast a single vote for each office or issue on which such voter is eligible to vote.”

It also has provisions providing that non-citizens may not register to vote, and provisions relating to vote-counting methods. The bill has already passed a House committee. The sponsors are Republican representatives Dan Shaul, John Simmons, and Brian Seitz.

The measure appears to have wording flaws. It clearly is not meant to apply to presidential primaries, so the text ought to say that it doesn’t apply to presidential primaries. Also the sponsors don’t seem to have realized that sometimes primary winners die before the general election. Current law lets parties substitute a new nominee, but the literal language of the bill would prevent such substitution. Thanks to Ken Bush for this news.