U.S. Supreme Court Accepts a Campaign Finance Case

On September 30, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Federal Election Commission v Cruz for Senate, 21-12. The issue is a federal law that limits a candidate to raising no more than $250,000 after an election is over, for the purpose of paying back to the candidate money he or she had loaned to the campaign. The lower court had struck down the law. The FEC asked the U.S. Supreme Court to summarily reverse the lower court decision, and the Ted Cruz Senate Campaign asked the U.S. Supreme Court to summarily approve the lower court decision. But the Court will do neither, and will hear the case itself.

U.S. Supreme Court Summarily Affirms 3-Judge Ruling that Depriving D.C. Residents of Voting Representation in Congress is Constitutional

On October 4, the U.S. Supreme Court summarily affirmed the decision of a 3-judge U.S. District Court in Castanon v U.S., 20-1279. The lower court had ruled that nothing in the Constitution requires that the District of Columbia be entitled to a voting representative in the U.S. House.

Here is the brief of the D.C. voters in the U.S. Supreme Court, a brief that has now been rejected. Thanks to Thomas Jones for this news.