Oregon Initiative for a Hybrid System of Nominations

An Oregon initiative called the “Voter Fairness Act” will begin to circulate soon. It would amend the State Constitution to say that there should be a system in which parties must either nominate by convention, or participate in a primary that is open to all voters. A party would decide 250 days before an election whether it wants to have nominees, but if it does, it can only nominate them by convention at its own expense. If it doesn’t want to do that, its candidates would run in a May primary in which candidates from all the non-convention parties would run. It would be up to the legislature to choose how many primary candidates would advance to the general election.

Here is the text, which is proposal 55.

New York Libertarian Party Nominates Larry Sharpe for Governor in 2026

The New York Libertarian Party held a state convention in Rochester on October 25, and nominated Larry Sharpe for Governor. Sharpe was also the party’s gubernatorial nominee in 2018, when he polled 95,033 votes and gave the Libertarians party status for the first time in history. However, that was taken away in 2020 when the legislature changed the definition of a qualified party to a group that polled 2% for Governor. Sharpe had polled 1.56% in 2018.

Sharpe has been campaigning for the 2026 election for weeks. He is planning to visit all 62 counties. The party’s state convention was unusually early, but the party will need 45,000 valid signatures to get Sharpe on the 2026 ballot, and it wants to get an early start on the campaign. The petitioning period is only six weeks, in April and May 2026. It is likely that a lawsuit will be filed against the short petitioning period and the early deadline. New York’s deadline had been in August, until it was moved to May in 2019.

Two U.S. District Courts Refuse to Stop California Redistricting Ballot Measure Election

On October 23, U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Texas member of Congress, Ronny Jackson. The case had been filed in Texas to stop the California election. The plaintiff, Jackson, claimed that if the California election went ahead, that would make it likely that Democrats would gain a majority in the U.S. House in November 2026, and that would injure Jackson because he would have less influence. Jackson v Weber, n.d. of Texas, 2:25cv-197. Judge Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, said Jackson did not have standing. Here is the order of dismissal.

On October 24, U.S. District Court Judge Kenly Kato, a Biden appointee, refused to enjoin the California election in a lawsuit filed by Steve Hilton, a California Republican candidate for Governor in 2026. Hilton v Weber, c.d., 8:25cv-1988. The case is still alive but the judge said the lawsuit can continue after the election, if Prop. 50 passes. Hilton had charged that the districts would not be equal in population, and also that California precedent doesn’t merit mid-decade districting. Here is his Complaint.