July 2019 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
July 1, 2019 – Volume 35, Number 2

This issue was printed on cream-colored paper.


Table of Contents

  1. WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST FREEDOM FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS
  2. NEBRASKA EASES INDEPENDENT PETITION
  3. ARIZONA MAKES PETITION DEADLINE WORSE
  4. NINTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS ARIZONA PRIMARY BALLOT ACCESS PETITIONS
  5. U.S. DISTRICT COURT UPHOLDS ARIZONA INDEPENDENT PETITION
  6. TEXAS BILL THAT PUTS GREEN PARTY ON BALLOT IS SIGNED
  7. COLORADO GOVERNOR SIGNS BILL MAKING BALLOT ACCESS WORSE
  8. VERMONT EASES PETITION RESTRICTION
  9. SEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS ILLINOIS PRIMARY PETITION
  10. PENNSYLVANIA FUSION
  11. OTHER LAWSUIT NEWS
  12. PENNSYLVANIA MAY REPEAL STRAIGHT-TICKET DEVICE
  13. RANKED CHOICE VOTING NEWS
  14. NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGISLATURE EASES PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ACCESS
  15. CALIFORNIA PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY BILLS
  16. NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE PLAN NEWS
  17. BOOK REVIEW: MR. PRESIDENT, HOW LONG MUST WE WAIT?
  18. PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY DATE CHANGES
  19. CALIFORNIA BILL ATTACKS AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY
  20. DAVID BERGLAND DIES
  21. HOWARD SCHULTZ ENDS CAMPAIGN
  22. LINCOLN CHAFEE REGISTERS LIBERTARIAN
  23. HOWIE HAWKINS DECLARES FOR THE GREEN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION
  24. 2019 LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS
  25. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

President Trump Sues to Overturn New York Law Letting Congress See His State Income Tax Return

On July 23, President Trump filed a federal lawsuit in D.C. to stop New York state from turning over his state income tax return to the Chair of the U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means. The Complaint says that even though the chair of the congressional committee initially said he would not ask New York state for a copy of the returns, the chair is now wavering on whether he will do that. Trump v Committee on Ways & Means and Letitia James, Attorney General of New York, 1:19cv-2173. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

Independent Voter Project Sues California, Arguing that State Constitution Requires a Different Type of Presidential Primary

On June 6, 1972, the California voters passed Proposition 4, which appeared on the ballot in this way: “Presidential Primary. Requires primary election wherein all recognized candidates for president are on ballot unless affidavit declaring non-candidacy is filed.”

The state legislature had placed that proposition on the ballot because it wanted the voters to be able to vote for all presidential candidates who were plainly seeking the nomination of one of the ballot-qualified parties. Before Proposition 4, sometimes leading presidential candidates would abstain from running in the California primary for political reasons. For example, John F. Kennedy did not file for the 1960 California Democratic presidential primary because he did not want to offend then-Governor Pat Brown, who was on the Democratic presidential primary ballot as a “favorite son”, meaning he could control the California Democratic delegation and make deals with the bona fide candidates at the convention.

On July 22, 2019, the Independent Voters Project, a leading proponent of the California top-two system, filed a lawsuit in Superior Court in San Bernardino County, arguing that Proposition 4 really means that California cannot hold a presidential primary unless all presidential candidates are on a single ballot, including independent candidates; and that all voters must be able to vote on that ballot, regardless of how they are registered. Boydston v Padilla, civ-ds-1921480.

Here is the portion of the California Constitution that Proposition 4 added. See section 5(c). The attorneys for the Independent Voters Project have seized on the accident that the legislators who wrote Proposition 4 used the words “open primary”. However, if one reads the full sentence that contains those two words, it is obvious that to the authors of Proposition 4, “open primary” was just the term to use for a primary that included all candidates. The term had nothing to do with who can vote in any particular primary. The Independent Voters Project complaint avoids quoting the full sentence in section 5(c). Instead, it only quotes the first half of the sentence.

The Independent Voters Project complaint says, “The presidential primary is an important stage of the public election process. It is the method through which voters decide which presidential candidates will appear on November’s ballot.” This is obviously untrue. In 2008, Hillary Clinton won the California Democratic presidential primary, but her name did not appear on the November ballot.