Politico Story on How California Tax Returns-Ballot Bill Could Injure Republicans for Congress & Legislature

Jeremy B. White here writes for Politico that a side effect of the California tax returns-ballot bill, if it is not invalidated in court, would be to lower Republican turnout in the March 2020 primary. Because California has its primary for all office in March, and because the top-two system requires Republicans for Congress and partisan state office to place first or second in March, Republican turnout (without Trump on its presidential primary ballot) could be depressed, which in turn would damage Republicans running for Congress and state legislature. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

California Secretary of State Requests that All Five Presidential Tax Returns-Ballot Cases Be Heard in Sacramento

On August 13, the California Secretary of state asked the U.S. District Court in San Diego to transfer De La Fuente v Padilla to the U.S. District Court in Sacramento. This is the case in which Rocky De La Fuente challenges the new California law requiring presidential primary candidates to reveal their income tax returns. The other four federal lawsuits are pending in the eastern district (Sacramento). The Secretary of State says it would be more efficient if all five of them were heard by the same Sacramento federal judge.

The Secretary of State also asked the San Diego federal court to expedite a decision on whether the De La Fuente case will be moved to Sacramento.

Arkansas Libertarian Party Sends Letter Response to Eighth Circuit in Ballot Access Case

On August 13, the Arkansas Libertarian Party responded to the Secretary of State’s letter that asks the Eighth Circuit to temporarily remove the party from the 2020 ballot. The Secretary of State had told the Eighth Circuit that the U.S. District Court decision putting the party on the ballot is mistaken. The Secretary of State letter had said the overwhelming weight of authority shows that the new ballot access law that was enjoined should have been upheld (it almost tripled the number of signatures needed for new parties).

The Arkansas Libertarian Party letter, like the Secretary of State’s letter, was sharply limited in length by court rules.