On July 1, the Eighth Circuit issued an eight-page opinion in Moore v Thurston, 18-1382. This is the case filed in 2014 against the Arkansas March deadline for non-presidential candidates. After the case won, the legislature changed the deadline to May 1. But, oddly, they still appealed to the Eighth Circuit, hoping to get a ruling that the U.S. District Court decision should be erased.
The Eighth Circuit declined to erase the U.S. District Court decision. Although the case became moot once the legislature improved the deadline, and although decisions in moot cases are sometimes vacated, in this case the U.S. District Court decision will not be vacated. The Eighth Circuit wrote, “Independent candidates and voters have repeatedly – and successfully – challenged Arkansas’s ballot-access requirements. We thus conclude that the public interest is best served by a substantial body of judicial precedents limiting the burden that those requirements may place on candidates’ and voters’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.”