Utah Independent Candidate Suspends Ballot Label Case To Give Legislature a Chance to Solve Problem

Marsha Holland has asked a U.S. District Court to suspend her election law lawsuit until April 1, 2020, because the state elections office has agreed to ask the legislature to fix the problem that she complained about. She was Utah’s only independent candidate on the ballot for any federal or state office in the 2018 election, so she was the only victim of a new law that gives independent candidates a harmful ballot label.

If the legislature does not change the law by early in the 2020 session, the case will be revived. The label says that an independent candidate is “not qualified” to be a party nominee. The case is Holland v Cox, 4:18cv-74.

New Bill in Iowa to Raise Petition Requirements for Unqualified Parties and Independent Candidates

On April 4, a subcommittee of the Iowa Senate amended a bill that had already passed the House, to add a provision making ballot access more difficult for independent candidates and the nominees of unqualified parties. Senator Roby Smith (R-Davenport) is responsible. The original bill, HF 692, had nothing to do with ballot access.

The amendment not only increases the number of signatures, but adds an unconstitutional county distribution requirement to petitions for statewide office and US House. Statewide petitions would need 4,000 (the existing law requires 1,500), with 200 signatures from each of ten counties. U.S. House petitions would need 2,000 signatures (the existing law requires 375 signatures), with 77 signatures from each of half the counties in the district.

State Senate petitions would rise from 100 to 200 signatures; State House petitions would rise from 50 to 100. Thanks to Joseph Howe for this news.