Lawsuit on California Party Labels Moves Ahead

On March 19, U.S. District Court Judge Andre Birotte asked attorneys for the state of California to file an Answer to the Complaint in Soltysik v Padilla, c.d., 2:15cv-7916. This is the case over whether members of unqualified parties may have their party listed on the ballot. Current law says they can only have “party preference: none” printed on the ballot, if they are running for Congress or partisan state office. The plaintiff is a registered Socialist.

The U.S. District Court had dismissed this case some years ago, but then the Ninth Circuit reinstated it, so there will be a trial unless the state decides to settle the case.

Idaho Senate Passes Bill Making it Far More Difficult to Get Initiatives on the Ballot

On March 22, the Idaho Senate passed SB 1159, which makes it far more difficult to get statewide initiatives on the ballot. The vote was 18-17. All seven Democrats voted against it, along with ten Republicans.

It increases the number of signatures from 6% of the registered voters to 10%. It increases the number of legislative districts in which the measure must get 10% from 18 districts to 32 districts (Idaho has 35 legislative districts). It shrinks the petitioning period from 18 months to 6 months.

The bill also says a single initiative sheet cannot contain signatures from different legislative districts.

The bill takes effect immediately, so for 2020, 56,192 valid signatures will be needed.

Kentucky Legislature Passes Bill Restricting When Voters May Change Parties

On March 14, the Kentucky Senate passed HB 325, which makes it more difficult for voters to switch parties prior to a primary. Current law lets them switch parties a month before the primary, but the bill says they can’t switch parties after December 31 of the year before the primary. The Governor hasn’t acted on the bill yet.