Daily News News Editorial on Reform Party Primary for U.S. House in New York City

The Daily News of New York city has this editorial about the June 26 congressional primary for the Reform Party in two districts. The editorial has objective information about the small number of voters who participated. It says the state law should be changed to make it more difficult for voters to obtain a primary in which write-ins are tallied. It ignores the much better idea, which the Reform Party has been trying to publicize, that the law should be changed to let small qualified parties nominate by convention instead of primary.

That idea was endorsed in 1951 by the National Civic League, in its publication, “A Model Direct Primary Law”, authored by Professor Joseph P. Harris. At the time he was considered the nation’s leading expert on election administration. The idea has been adopted in Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia (for statewide office only), Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming. In addition, many other states let new qualified parties nominate by convention. And Alabama, South Carolina, and Virginia let all parties, large and small alike, decide for themselves whether to nominate by primary or convention.

Arizona Voter Sues to Overturn 2016 Law that Makes it a Crime for Most Individuals to Handle a Voted Mail-in Ballot

On July 3, an Arizona resident filed a federal lawsuit to overturn the 2016 Arizona law that makes it a crime for most individuals to handle a voted, sealed, mail-in ballot. The resident, a member of the Arizona League of Women Voters named Rivko Knox, says she makes it a practice to help individuals in her community to vote, and that before the 2016 law took effect, she would sometimes visit voters and volunteer to deliver their voted, sealed, ballot to a postal pickup box. The case is Knox v Brnovich. It is assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Douglas L. Rayes, an Obama appointee.

The 14-page complaint says that the U.S. government’s ancient laws on postal delivery supercede the Arizona law. The complaint argues that only the federal government could ever make it a crime for anyone to drop a piece of mail into a postal delivery receptacle.

The Arizona law makes an exception for family members, caregivers, and household members.

Virginia State Board of Elections Says Libertarian U.S. Senate Petition is Valid

On July 6, the Virginia State Board of Elections determined that Matt Waters has enough valid signatures to be on the November 2018 ballot for U.S. Senate. He is the Libertarian nominee. He needed 10,000 valid signatures. The only other candidates on the ballot for U.S. Senate are the Democratic incumbent, Tim Kaine; and the Republican nominee, Corey Stewart.

The Libertarian Party has never been a qualified party in Virginia. The last qualified third party in Virginia was the Reform Party, but it lost its status in November 1997. The only states in which the Democratic and Republican Parties have been the only ballot-qualified parties continuously during the last twenty years are New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia (however, the only qualified third parties in Georgia were only qualified for statewide office, not district or county office). The problem in Virginia is that a party is defined as a group that got 10% in any statewide race in either of the last two statewide elections. Bills have been introduced repeatedly to lower the 10%, but they always fail to pass.

Arizona Initiative for the National Popular Vote Appears Not to have Gathered Enough Signatures

An Arizona initiative to provide that the state would join the National Popular Vote compact appears not to have enough signatures. July 5 was the deadline for statewide initiatives, and according to this article, only four different initiatives submitted signatures, not including the National Popular Vote initiative.

U.S. District Court Allows Willie Wilson to Continue Part of Case Against Democratic National Committee

Willie Lee Wilson was a candidate for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination. In 2017 he sued the Democratic National Committee over his belief that the national party had injured his campaign. On June 22, U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden allowed part of Wilson’s case to proceed, although the judge dismissed other parts.

The allegations for which evidence can now be presented are: (1) Even though Wilson was invited to a multi-candidate campaign rally in South Carolina, Democratic National Committee officials allowed Secret Service agents on Hillary Clinton’s detail to use the threat of force to keep Wilson off the stage; (2) the party refused to allow Wilson to enter into a contract to obtain the party’s voter registration files. Here is the 14-page ruling in Wilson v DNC Services Corporation, D.C., 1:17cv-730.