August 2018 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
August 1, 2018 – Volume 34, Number 3

This issue was printed on tan paper.


Table of Contents

  1. ALL ELEVEN JUDGES OF THE D.C. CIRCUIT WILL HEAR LIBERTARIAN CAMPAIGN FINANCE CHALLENGE
  2. JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGH
  3. MONTANA COURT REMOVES GREEN PARTY FROM BALLOT
  4. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTOR LAWSUIT IS PENDING IN WASHINGTON
  5. BOOK REVIEW: REFORMING THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATING PROCESS
  6. LIBERTARIAN 2020 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES
  7. U.S. SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN COMPULSORY SPEECH
  8. LEGISLATIVE NEWS
  9. MORE LAWSUIT NEWS
  10. 2018 PETITIONING FOR STATEWIDE OFFICE
  11. NEW POLITICAL PARTY
  12. TWO REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL NOMINEES ARE HOLOCAUST DENIERS
  13. REPUBLICANS CHOOSE CHARLOTTE FOR 2020 NATIONAL CONVENTION
  14. SPECIAL U.S. HOUSE ELECTION, TEXAS
  15. OKLAHOMA LIBERTARIANS WIN TOP SPOT ON BALLOT
  16. ILLINOIS MAYOR CREATES HIS OWN PARTY TO RUN FOR LEGISLATURE
  17. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

Florida State Appeals Court Puts Democrat Back on Primary Ballot for Attorney General

On August 28, the Florida State Court of Appeals, First District, restored Ryan Torrens to the Democratic primary ballot. He is a candidate for Attorney General. Last week a trial court had “removed” him from the ballot. The primary is today, Tuesday, August 28. The lower court couldn’t physically remove his name from the ballots, but ordered that his votes could not be counted. But now they will be counted. See this story.

North Carolina State Court of Appeals Refuses to Disturb Chris Anglin’s Win on Ballot Label

On August 27, the North Carolina State Court of Appeals refused to issue a stay in Anglin v Berger. This means that Chris Anglin’s win of August 13 in the lower state court will stand. He will have “Republican” on the ballot next to his name in November when he runs for State Supreme Court Justice. The legislature had passed a law earlier this year depriving him of a ballot label, but the lower court had enjoined it. See this story. The case number in the Appeals Court is P18-586.

North Carolina Congressional Districts Again Struck Down as a Partisan Gerrymander

On August 27, a 3-judge U.S. District Court again struck down North Carolina’s U.S. House districts as an unconstitutional gerrymander. Common Cause v Rucho, m.d., 1:16cv-1026. Judge James Wynn, an Obama appointee, wrote the decision. Judge W. Earl Britt, a Carter appointee, signed it. They wrote that the Constitution prohibits any redistricting that is deliberately designed to help one particular party and injure another party.

The same panel had early this year come to a similar decision. Then the state had appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sent the case back with instructions to re-do it.

Judge William Osteen, Jr., a Bush Jr. appointee, agreed with the other two judges that the North Carolina districts are unconstitutional, because the partisanship in that plan is so extreme. But he also wrote that the Constitution does not prohibit all partisan gerrymandering.

The decision invites the legislature, which is in session, to redraw the districts. Because the primary has already been held, the opinion suggests that the general election could be changed so that filing is re-opened and individuals would run without being party nominees. The same remedy has sometimes been used in Texas, when redistricting was struck down after the primary was over. The decision notes that the North Carolina legislature had created a similar system this year for state judicial elections. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

U.S. District Court Enjoins Michigan Independent Candidate Petition Requirement

On August 27, U.S. District Court Judge Victoria A. Roberts, a Clinton appointee, enjoined Michigan’s petition for independent candidates for statewide office, which is 30,000 signatures due July 19. She said that pending further action in the case, or further action by the legislature, 5,000 signatures will be the requirement. The case is Graveline v Johnson, e.d., 2:18cv-12354.

The order is 25 pages. It depends largely on the fact that (except for president in 1992 and 2004), no independent candidate has ever qualified for statewide office in Michigan, in the history of the law, which was passed in 1988. Another factor in the decision is that Michigan law says that independent candidates who are running in jurisdictions with a population between 2,000,000 and 4,999,999 only need 12,000 signatures. Ironically, there is no such office in Michigan, and it is puzzling why the legislature ever created the 12,000-requirement for a nonexistent office. Finally, the decision depends on the fact that the petition deadline is more than six weeks before qualified parties choose their Attorney General nominees. Qualified parties in Michigan, large and small, use conventions for that office, not primaries.

Here is a news story about the decision.