A New Variation of Approval Voting May Appear on Ballot in Lane County, Oregon, for Use in Future County Office Elections

The supporters of Approval Voting appear to have qualified an initiative in Lane County, Oregon. If the county initiative has enough valid signatures and is otherwise approved for the ballot, Lane County voters would vote on the idea in November 2018.

This type of Approval Voting is new. First, the voters assign a numerical value (registering how much they like the candidate) to each candidate listed on the ballot. It is not necessary for the voter to do this for each candidate listed. Then, the sum total for each candidate is calculated. The vote for the two highest candidates is re-examined, and the number of voters (among the voters who assigned a score to each candidate) who preferred one of the two candidates, relative to the other candidate, is checked. Of the two strongest candidates, the one preferred by the most voters wins.

In such a system, if a voter assigns an equal score to each of the two top candidates, then his or her vote is discounted as an abstention. This feature of the system motivates voters to give sincere scores. This new system is termed by its inventors “Star voting”, where “Star” means “Score-then-automatic-runoff.” Here is a short video about the system, from http://Equal. Vote. Thanks to Independent Voters Network for the link.

This system, along with ranked choice voting, has the virtue of being held in the general election, when public interest is highest. It allows the primary to be eliminated, which also saves election administration cost.

Washington State Files Ninth Circuit Brief in Case over Law Requiring Presidential Petitioners to Give Advance Notice in Newspapers

On June 26, the Washington Secretary of State filed this opening brief in the Ninth Circuit in De La Fuente v Wyman, 18-35208. The issue is the state law that says petitions to place an independent presidential candidate, or the presidential nominee of an unqualified party, can’t start to circulate until the group has run a legal notice in a newspaper, explaining where they will be petitioning.

The U.S. District Court had invalidated the law.

The state emphasizes in its appeal brief that many independent presidential candidates, and presidential nominees of unqualified parties, have managed to comply with the law. But in Anderson v Celebrezze, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Ohio’s March independent presidential petition deadline, even though many presidential candidates had complied with the March deadline. Footnote 12 of Anderson v Celebrezze acknowledges that in 1980 alone, five presidential petitions managed to comply with the March deadline, but that wasn’t enough to save the law. Also in 1976, five Ohio independent presidential petitions had also complied with the deadline.

Florida Prisons Continue to Censor The Militant, Newspaper of the Socialist Workers Party

The Militant has this article, describing persistent efforts by Florida prison officials to forbid inmates from receiving copies of The Militant, even though those prisoners are subscribers. Generally the newspaper appeals these decisions and wins, but the behavior persists.

The Socialist Workers Party is the only nationally-organized political party in the United States with its own print weekly newspaper.