The U.S. Supreme Court issued two opinions on Tuesday, May 29, but did not issue any of the five pending election law decisions. The next decisions will be released June 4.
On May 23-24, the New York Democratic Party held its state convention. The delegates tabled a resolution that would have allowed independent voters to vote in Democratic Party primaries, if they switched to being Democrats by 25 days before the primary. Parties have the right to decide to let independent voters vote in their primaries, regardless of state law. Current New York statutory law says no one can vote in a primary (except new registrants) unless they had registered into the party in the year before the election.
Professor Charles Wheelan, founder of the Centrist Project, which is now called Unite America, discusses his project here. The interview is carried by Merion West, an on-line news source which carries news about attempts to strengthen the center in the U.S.
A Los Angeles Times-USC poll recently asked Californians if they prefer a closed primary, a semi-closed primary, or the current top-two system. 50% support the top-two system; 40% support a semi-closed primary; 10% support a closed primary. See this story. The poll was conducted on-line between April 18 and May 18, before much of the publicity about how Democratic candidates for Governor and for U.S. House in certain districts are using insincere campaign messages to influence Republican voters to choose one Republican over another Republican.
Unfortunately the poll did not ask voters about a blanket primary. In a blanket primary, all party candidates appear on a single primary ballot, and all voters use that ballot. But the top vote-getter from each party then goes to the November ballot. Independent candidates do not participate in the primary, but petition directly onto the November ballot. California used that system in 1998 and 2000. The U.S. Supreme Court said it violated freedom of association for political parties to be forced to let outsiders help choose their nominees. But the system could be made constitutional if it were voluntary, and parties that didn’t want to use a blanket primary could instead nominate by convention.
This San Diego Union-Tribune story explains how backers of each of the two leading Democratic candidates for California Governor are propagating insincere messages aimed at Republican voters. Backers of Democrat Gavin Newsom are portraying Republican candidate John Cox as a true conservative in order to help Cox receive more Republican votes. Backers of the other leading Democrat in the race, Antonio Villaraigosa, are sending insincere messages trying to make the other leading Republican, Travis Allen, appear more attractive to Republican voters.
Newsom’s motive is to make it more likely that Cox, instead of Villaraigosa, will place second in the June 5 primary. Newsom thinks Cox would be easier to beat in November than Vallaraigosa would be. Villaraigosa hopes that Allen will draw votes away Cox and so enhance the chances that Viiaraigosa will come in second.