U.S. District Court Hears Case Against New Hampshire Law that Permits Election Officials to Discard Absentee Ballots without Warning if Signature Doesn’t Match

On July 16, a U.S. District Court heard a case challenging the practice of New Hampshire election officials, relative to absentee mail ballots. The practice is to discard such ballots, without telling the voter, if the official believes the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope doesn’t match the voter’s signature on the voter registration application. The case is Saucedo v New Hampshire Secretary of State, 1:17cv-183. See this story.

The case is before U.S. District Court Judge Landya McCafferty, an Obama appointee.

Kansas City Star Says Parties with Closed Primaries Should Not Receive Tax-Funded Primaries

On July 16, the Kansas City Star editorialized that Kansas government should no longer pay the election-administration costs of Republican and Democratic primaries, because neither party lets independents vote in their primaries. As the editorial says, independents can vote in major party primaries if they sign up with a major party at the polls on primary day, but some independent voters don’t want to do this. The editorial also points out that in Missouri, there is no such thing as registration into parties, and any voter on primary day is free to choose any primary ballot. Thanks to Shawn Griffiths for the link.

Michigan Supreme Court Hears Argument on Redistricting Initiative on Wednesday, July 18

The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday, July 18, on whether the initiative to set up a nonpartisan redistricting commission should be on the November 2018 ballot. See this story. The Michigan Supreme Court is elected on a partisan basis, and five of the seven justices are Republicans. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.

Everyone agrees the initiative has enough valid signatures. The opponents of the initiative say the proposal is a revision of the State Constitution, not just an amendment, and therefore the initiative process can’t be used.

Washington State 2016 “Disobedient” Presidential Electors Ask Washington Supreme Court to Hear Appeal

Three of the four Washington State Democratic presidential electors who voted for someone other than Hillary Clinton in the electoral college in December 2016 — faithless electors — have asked the State Supreme Court to hear their appeal. They were each fined $1,000, and they maintain the fine is unconstitutional. The case is Chiafalo v State, 95347-3.

All of the other cases filed on this topic have been in federal court. The Minnesota case is pending in the 8th circuit; the Colorado case is pending in the 10th circuit; the California elector already lost in U.S. District Court on standing and didn’t appeal.

Here is the electors’ brief in the Washington State Supreme Court, filed in May 2018.