U.S. District Court in Massachusetts Again Enjoins President Trump’s Order on Birthright Citizenship

On July 25, U.S. District Court Judge Leo Sorokin, an Obama appointee, again enjoined President Trump’s birthright citizenship order. State of New Jersey v Trump, 1:25cv-10139, District of Massachusetts. He had done so previously on February 13. He heard the case again because on June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court in another birthright case had said U.S. District Court judges can’t normally issue nationwide injunctions. However, the U.S. Supreme Court said they can if the plaintiffs are states.

Because this case has many state governments as plaintiffs, it was not surprising that Judge Sorokin again enjoined the presidential order.

Independent Candidate for Cheektowaga, New York, Town Board Placed on Ballot by State Court Even Though his Petition Sheets Didn’t Mention Cheektowaga

On July 24, independent candidate Daniel Kollander was put on the November 4, 2025 ballot for Town Board of Cheektowaga, by a lower state court. The Board of Elections had rejected his petition because the individual petition sheets didn’t mention the name of the town in the “Public Office” blank, although the name of the town was in two other places on the petition.

U.S. Supreme Court Extends Freeze on North Dakota Legislative Redistricting

On July 24, the U.S. Supreme Court extended the hold in Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v Howe, 25A62. The vote was 6-3, with Justices Gorsuch, Alito and Thomas in the minority. This is the North Dakota legislative redistricting case. The Eighth Circuit had restored the legislature’s redistricting plan on the grounds that private individuals and groups can’t sue under the Voting Rights Act, a surprising conclusion given the history of how the act has been used since it was passed in 1965.

Congressmember Michael Bost Files U.S. Supreme Court Brief on Standing

On July 22, Illinois Congressmember Michael Bost filed his brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in Bost v Illinois State Board of Elections, 24-568. The issue is whether he had standing to challenge the Illinois law that postal ballots should be counted if they arrive within 14 days of the election, assuming they are postmarked by election day. The lower courts had ruled that he does’t have standing to challenge the Illinois law.

His brief makes a forceful statement that candidates always have standing to challenge election laws that affect them. The case will be argued in the fall of 2025.