Federal Election Commission Rejects Evidence Against Commission on Presidential Debates

On Wednesday, March 29, the Federal Election Commission held a closed meeting and rejected all the evidence that the Commission on Presidential Debates is breaking campaign finance laws. The outcome was not very surprising, because the FEC staff had prepared a finding with that conclusion on March 23.
Thanks to IVN for this news.

It is possible that Level the Playing Field, which had won a court order telling the FEC to look at the evidence again, will now return to U.S. District Court and argue that the March 29 FEC finding is still inadequate.

France Holds Four-Hour Presidential Debate with All Eleven Candidates

On April 4, France held a four-hour televised presidential debate. All eleven candidates who are on the ballot were included. This Guardian story focuses on candidate Philippe Poutou of the Anti-Capitalist Party. He had run in the previous presidential election and had only polled 1%, but he was included in the 2017 debate, and according to the story, he did well.

First Special Congressional Election of 2017 Held in California

On April 4, the first special congressional election of 2017 was held in Los Angeles County, California. Two Democrats each polled about 25% of the vote. Because no one got 50%, these two Democrats will face off in a run-off in June. They are Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez, and Robert Lee Ahn, a former Los Angeles planning Commissioner who raised more money than any other candidate in this race.

Here are the preliminary election results.

U.S. District Court Hears Montana Ballot Access Lawsuit

On April 4, U.S. District Court Judge Brian Morris held a 3-hour trial in Breck v Stapleton, 9:17cv-36. The issue is the Montana ballot access law for independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties, in the 2017 special election for U.S. House. The election was called on March 1, and the Secretary of State said anyone who wanted to run in that election, who was not the nominee of a qualified party, needs 14,268 signatures by March 3. Later he changed the deadline to March 6. Such candidates also must pay a filing fee of $1,740. The plaintiffs argue that it is not reasonable to expect anyone to collect so many signatures in such a short time.

Here is a brief newspaper article about the hearing. The decision will come out very soon, perhaps on Wednesday, April 5. The plaintiffs include one independent candidate, and the nominee of the Green Party, which is not ballot-qualified in Montana. The only three qualified parties are Republican, Democratic and Libertarian, and they all have nominees, none of whom needed any signatures.

Oklahoma Legislative Hearing on One Ballot Access Bill is Wednesday, April 5

On April 5, the Oklahoma House Elections Committee will hear SB 145. This bill makes it easier for independent presidential candidate, and the presidential nominees of unqualified parties, to get on the ballot. It has already passed the State Senate.

The committee won’t hear the other Oklahoma ballot access bill, SB 350, on April 5. That is the bill to make it easier for a party to remain on the ballot. It had also passed the Senate, but later than SB 145, so perhaps it will have a hearing in the House Committee on April 12.