Twenty-Three Candidates File for California Special U.S. House Election

California holds a special election to fill the vacant U.S. House seat, 34th district, on April 4. Twenty-three candidates filed to be on the ballot. Here is the list. The Secretary of State has not yet determined which candidates will be on the ballot, because each candidate needs 40 signatures, but the list will be final on February 15.

The candidates who filed are 19 Democrats, one Republican, one Green, one Libertarian, and one independent. If no one gets 50% on April 4, there will be a run-off in June.

In November 2016, only two candidates filed to be on the ballot. They were both Democrats. The seat is empty because the incumbent resigned to become Attorney General of California. UPDATE: all 23 candidates are on the ballot; they all had valid petitions.

Eight Candidates So Far File for Georgia Special U.S. House Election

Georgia holds a special U.S. House election on April 18. So far, five Republicans, two Democrats, and one independent has filed, although filing doesn’t close until one p.m. on February 15. See this story. Georgia special U.S. House elections are non-partisan and parties don’t have nominees, although any candidate can have a party label on the ballot. No candidate needs a petition in Georgia special elections.

Oklahoma Legislative Leaders Appear to be Supporting Moderate Ballot Access Improvement for Independent Presidential Candidates

There are two bills pending in the Oklahoma legislature to ease ballot access for independent presidential candidates. The more far-reaching bill cuts the number of signatures to 5,000, and proposes a filing fee alternative of $5,000. That bill is by legislative leaders Senator David Holt (SB 351) and Representative Jon Echols (HB 1563).

Also, there is the proposal of the State Board of Elections, which lowers the number of signatures for an independent presidential candidate from 3% of the last presidential vote, to 3% of the last gubernatorial vote. If that were enacted, the number of signatures for 2016 would have been 24,745 instead of 40,047. That bill, SB 145, is authored by Senator Eddie Fields. It also has a filing fee alternative to the petition, but it is ambiguous: $2,500 for each candidate for presidential elector. The bill, and existing law, does not require an independent presidential candidate to run a full slate of presidential elector candidates. But if a full slate were required, the full fee would be $17,500, because Oklahoma has 7 electoral votes. Even a fee that high would probably be cheaper than gathering 24,745 valid signatures.

On February 14, Representative Echols became a co-sponsor of SB 145, and on February 8, Senator Holt because a co-sponsor, which suggests that this is the bill most likely to move. The bill retains the July 15 petition deadline, but it seems that if a candidate will be permitted to get on the ballot with a fee, there is no reason for the deadline to be that early. Evan McMullin did not declare his candidacy until August 8, 2016.

Maine Bill to Ban Paying Initiative Circulators on a Per-Signature Basis

Maine Representative Stacey Guerin (R-Glenburn) has introduced LD 53, to make it illegal to pay initiative circulators on a per-signature basis. The bill is very carelessly worded. Usually bills to do this are careful to specify that initiative proponents are free to award bonuses to high-performing circulators, but this bill simply bans all payment on the basis of how many signatures were collected, without discussing the nuances.

If the bill passes, it must then get a popular vote in 2018, because it is a constitutional amendment. Thanks to several people for the news.