New York Times Editorializes in Favor of a Clearly Unconstitutional Ballot Access Law

The New York Times has this editorial in its December 12, 2016 edition, supporting a proposed New York bill that would bar candidates from the ballot if they don’t release their income tax returns before the election. This would clearly be unconstitutional under the 1995 U.S. Supreme Court opinion U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, which says that neither states nor congress can add to the qualifications to run for federal office.

The editorial quotes legal scholar Laurence Tribe as saying, “Ballot access requirements vary significantly from state to state, and it seems that New York might be able to simply add tax disclosure as a procedural ballot access requirement.”

U.S. District Court Won’t Give Colorado Presidential Electors Freedom to Vote for Someone Other than the Person They Said They Would Vote For

On December 12, a U.S. District Court Judge in Colorado ruled from the bench that he would not grant any relief to two Colorado Democratic presidential electors who say they may want to vote for someone other than Hillary Clinton. The ruling so far is oral only, and has not been put in writing. Thanks to the Election Law Blog for the news. According to this story, one of the Democrats says he still isn’t going to vote for the ticket that he was expected to vote for.