Kansas Secretary of State Releases Presidential Write-in Totals from November 2024 Election

The Kansas Secretary of State has released the number of votes received by the declared write-in presidential candidates from the November 2024 election. Jill Stein 1,773; Peter Sonski 613; Claudia De la Cruz 270; Cornel West 169; Shiva Ayyadurai 8; Beij Boring 8; Doug Bell 5; Christopher Garrity 2; Ajay Sood 2; John Gibb 1.

Stein was the Green Party nominee; Sonski American Solidariy; De l Cruz Socialism & Liberation.

These results were obtained through the efforts of Tony Roza of the Green Papers. He had to use the state Freedom of Information law to get the results. These results are not on the Kansas Secretary of State’s website. That website doesn’t have the vote by county for the presidential candidates who were on the ballot, either. It just has the statewide totals and a massive file that gives the vote by precinct.

Plaintiffs File Brief in Illinois Ballot Access Case

On June 4, the plaintiffs challenging certain Illinois ballot access laws filed this brief in Team Kennedy v Illinois State Board of Elections, n.d., 1:24cv-7027. The plaintiffs are the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. independent campaign, the Illinois Libertarian Party, and independent U.S. House candidate Angel Oakley.

The case challenges the 90-day window for circulating independent and minor party petitions, the law that says circulators who circulated a primary petition anywhere in the U.S. cannot circulate a general election petition, and the requirement that each sheet be notarized.

U.S. District Court Says New Jersey’s New Law on Ballot Design in Primaries May Not Have Fixed the Discriminatory Problem

On June 3, U.S. District Court Judge Zahid Quraishi issued a seven-page order in Kim v Hanlon, 3:24cv-1098, the case over New Jersey’s ballot design in primary elections. The order says the new law may not have cured all the problems with the old system. In the old system, some primary candidates were given a far more prominent place on the ballot. The order says the new law still makes it possible for some candidates to be given more favorable treatment. So the case will continue.

Ninth Circuit Will Rehear Case on Whether Oxnard, California Limits on Campaign Contributions are Unconstitutional

On June 4, the Ninth Circuit said it will rehear Moving Oxnard Forward v Ascension, 21-56295. The original panel had ruled that the Oxnard, California limits on how much a donor may contribute to a candidate for city office are too low, and also that the limits had been passed with the improper motive of injuring Aaron Starr, a member of the Libertarian Party who is now on the city council.

The rehearing will be in September, before eleven judges of the Ninth Circuit chosen randomly.