Two Law Professors Publish Paper on Struggle for Power within Republican Party between Official Party Officers and Wealthy Individuals who Aren’t Party Officers

Law Professors Joseph Fishkin and Heather Gerkin have published a scholarly paper on the current status of the national Republican Party, in which the official party structure and the Koch Brothers each have their own database of Republican Party donors, activists, and voters. The Koch Brothers’ database is superior to the party’s database. Fishkin and Gerkin conceive of the Koch Brothers as part of the national Republican Party, despite their lack of office within the party. Their paper explores the ramifications of this split between the formal party structure and the party’s influential backers. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Three Opinions, None of them Relating to Election Law or First Amendment

On June 15, the U.S. Supreme Court released three opinions, but did not release any opinions relating to election law or the First Amendment. The only two remaining days for U.S. Supreme Court decisions for this term are June 22 and June 29. UPDATE: there will also probably be decisions on Thursday, June 18. Thanks to Thomas Jones for that update.

Kentucky Libertarian Debates Lawsuit Undergoes Extraordinary Delay

The Libertarian Party filed a federal lawsuit over the Kentucky U.S. Senate debate on September 28, 2014, called Libertarian National Committee v Holliday, eastern district, 3:14cv-63. Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove denied injunctive relief, and the Libertarian U.S. Senate nominee, David Patterson, was barred from all debates.

The case is still alive. Patterson and his party charge that the debate sponsors changed the rules on which candidates should be invited. When it appeared Patterson might qualify, the debate sponsors said no one could be invited who had not raised at least $100,000 and was at 10% in the polls. Patterson and the party requested permission to file an amended complaint back on November 6, 2014, and the judge still has not ruled on whether the amended complaint can be filed. The amended complaint contains new information that had not come out when the original complaint had been filed. It also asks for a jury trial.