On August 14, a Louisiana state court rejected a lawsuit filed by a voter who wants to be registered as both a Democrat and as a Republican. He also wants to run for the legislature this year. See this story.
2
In These Times has this detailed story about how badly vote-by-mail worked in 2014 in San Juan County, Utah, for the parts of the county that are in the Navajo Reservation.
Florence Sebern, a Republican Party activist in Colorado, has this article in The Colorado Statesman, arguing that presidential caucuses are superior to presidential primaries. Colorado’s legislature this year considered switching to a presidential primary, but did not pass the bill that would have made the change. The Colorado Statesman is a weekly newspaper in Denver covering politics.
This Los Angeles Times editorial applauds the U.S. District Court decision of August 11, striking down a New Hampshire law that criminalizes the act of photographing one’s own voted ballot and then showing it to anyone at all. The decision is Rideout v Gardner. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.
On August 11, attorneys for the state of South Dakota filed a brief in Libertarian Party of South Dakota v Krebs, 4:15-cv-4111. The lawsuit was filed by the Libertarian and Constitution Parties on June 15, 2015, against the March petition deadline for a newly-qualifying party. The state’s brief says the Libertarian and Constitution Parties haven’t been injured by the deadline (so far, at least) and therefore they don’t have standing.
Three times, the U.S. Supreme Court has found that minor party or independent candidates do have standing to challenge restrictive ballot access laws whether they have tried to petition or not. Many lower courts have issued similar opinions, including the Eighth Circuit itself. South Dakota is in the Eighth Circuit. The South Dakota government brief does not mention any election law cases, just cases involving standing in other areas of law.