Georgia Says Rocky De La Fuente Doesn’t Have Enough Signatures, Even Though He Turned in Double the Requirement

On August 23, Georgia filed a response in the lawsuit De La Fuente v Kemp, n.d.1:16cv-2937. The case was filed to challenge the Georgia law that says an independent presidential candidate must file a list of his or her presidential elector candidates on July 1, even though the petition itself is not due until July 12 and the petition names the elector candidates.

The state’s response says the case is moot because De La Fuente doesn’t have enough valid signatures anyway. This is surprising, because he submitted approximately 14,500, and the requirement is 7,500. No one had told De La Fuente he didn’t have enough valid signatures until this brief was filed.

In 1980, Georgia told independent presidential candidate John B. Anderson that he didn’t have enough valid signatures, and when Anderson tried to check the validity, the state said it was too late because the ballots were about to be printed. Anderson then sued in federal court, and the judge said due process demanded that Anderson be given time to double-check the validity. Because the state said there was no time, the judge put Anderson on the ballot. That case, Anderson v Poythress, is not reported. De La Fuente’s attorneys are aware of the 1980 precedent.

Kansas Says Jill Stein Petition is Valid

On August 23, the Kansas Secretary of State said the Jill Stein independent petition has enough valid signatures. Her petition was the only independent petition filed.

The qualified parties are Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican. The Reform Party was previously ballot-qualified, but Secretary of State Kris Kobach removed it from the ballot in December 2012, even though by precedent and the previous interpretation of the law by earlier Secretaries of State, the party should have remained on the ballot. But the Reform Party of Kansas didn’t fight back.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan Asks Ohio to Respond to Ohio Libertarian Request

On Wednesday, August 24, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan asked Ohio to respond to the Libertarian Party’s brief of August 23. The response is due Thursday, August 25, at 3 p.m. 16A181.

By contrast, last time the Ohio Libertarian Party asked Justice Kagan to act on its application, she denied the request in two days without having asked for a response. That was the same case, in an earlier stage, when the party hoped to be allowed to participate in the 2016 primary. That application was 15A725, filed on January 12, 2016, and denied on January 14, 2016.

The Kagan request for the current case requires fast action by Ohio. By contrast, the North Carolina voting rights case, North Carolina v North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, was submitted by the state of North Carolina on August 15, and Chief Justice John Roberts asked for a response from the other side by August 25.

Ohio Accepts Two Presidential Independent Petitions and Rejects Two Others

On August 24, the Ohio Secretary of State’s office said that the independent presidential petitions of Gary Johnson and Richard Duncan both have enouvh valid signatures. Both of them had approximately 12,000 signatures. The requirement is 5,000.

The Secretary of State’s office said that the petitions for Darrell Castle and Michael Steinberg do not have enough valid signatures. The Steinberg petition consisted of Steinberg for president and Rocky De La Fuente for vice-president. In other states these two are also running mates, but De La Fuente is the presidential candidate and Steinberg is the vice-presidential candidate. The De La Fuente campaign reversed the names on the Ohio petition to avoid having a fight with the Secretary of State over the sore loser law.

The three qualified parties in Ohio are Democratic, Green, and Republican.