Maine has public funding for candidates for state office. The fund is running out of money. On April 12, the legislature passed LD 1579, a bill putting $2,500,000 into the fund. But on April 25, Governor Paul LePage vetoed the bill. The bill had passed the Senate 26-9, and the House 81-65. It is not clear if the legislature will override the veto.

On April 28, the Oklahoma Senate again passed SB 896, the bill that lowers the vote test for a party to remain on the ballot from 10% to 2.5%. The vote was 26-14. The bill had already passed the Senate in March, and then it had passed the House. But the House had amended the effective date, so the bill needed another vote in the Senate to agree to the amendment. Assuming the Governor signs it, the only states that will still have vote tests of 10% are New Jersey and Virginia. Two other states, Alabama and Pennsylvania, have even higher tests. But the other 46 states will be at 5% or less.

All of the “No” votes were Republicans, except that one Democrat, Senator Kevin Matthews, also voted “No.” The bill takes effect November 1, 2016.

In 2012, the Libertarian Party polled over 2.5% for President in New Mexico and Montana, and polled 2.48% in Alaska. It is difficult for any third party to poll as much as 2.5% for President, but not out of the question, especially in 2016, with so much voter discontent for the likely major party nominees. Thanks to E. Zachary Knight for this news.

Looking back in history, if the 2.5% had existed in the law instead of the actual vote test (which was 5% 1913-1974 and 10% afterwards), the change would not have made any difference in any election more recent than 1934, when the Socialist Party got 2.66% for Governor. The Reform Party got 10.84% in 1996 and 1.21% in 1998. The American Party got 2.30% for President in 1972, and 20.32% in 1968. The change would also have made a difference in 1924, when the Progressive Party got 7.79%.