As Expected, Georgia Appeals March 17 Decision Striking Down Presidential Petition Requirement

On April 13, the Georgia Secretary of State filed a notice of appeal in Green Party of Georgia v Kemp. On March 17 a U.S. District Court had invalidated the petition requirement for unqualified parties and independent candidates to place a presidential candidate on the ballot.

This lawsuit was filed in 2012 and it took four years to get a decision in U.S. District Court. During that entire four years, and even for an entire week after the March 17 decision, the Atlanta daily newspaper did not even mention the case. But the case now has the interest of the media, and the very fact that the state filed an appeal resulted in this story.

Utah Republican Party Renews Claim that Primary Ballot Access Law Violates Party’s Freedom of Association

On April 11, the U.S. District Court that is hearing Utah Republican Party v Herbert asked the Republican Party whether the party still contests the constitutionality of the Utah election code that governs how candidates may get on the Republican Party primary ballot. The federal court asked for a response by April 13.

On April 13, the Republican Party responded that it still believes that the election code, as recently interpreted by the Utah Supreme Court, violates the party’s right to control its own nomination process. Therefore, the federal court will again take up the question of whether the law is unconstitutional or not. The law says candidates seeking a Republican nomination can either show substantial support at a party caucus, or petition to get on the primary ballot. The party does not want anyone to be able to petition onto the primary ballot. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.

Arizona Libertarian Party Files Federal Lawsuit Against New Law Making it Difficult for Libertarians to get on Primary Ballots

On April 12, the Arizona Libertarian Party filed a federal lawsuit against the law passed last year that makes it difficult for members of small qualified parties to get themselves on their own party’s primary ballot. Arizona Libertarian Party v Reagan, 1:16cv-1019.

The old law required signatures for a member of any party to get on a primary ballot equal to one-half of 1% of that party’s registration (for statewide office), or 1% of that party’s registration for district and county office. The new law changes the denominator from the number of registered voters in that party, to the number of voters who are in that party or who are not members of any qualified party. The new law does not change the law for “new” parties, so the new law, for 2016 and 2018, has no impact on the Green Party, and very little effect on the major parties. But it vastly increases the primary petition burden for Libertarians. For 2016, a statewide Libertarian needs 3,023 signatures of registered Libertarians or registered independents, whereas under the old law, 134 signatures of registered Libertarians were needed. The case is assigned by Judge David T. Campbell, a Bush Jr. appointee.

Seventh Circuit Remands Case on Wisconsin’s Photo ID Law, Gives Hope to Opponents of Photo-ID Laws

On April 12, the Seventh Circuit issued this seven-page opinion in Frank v Walker, 15-3582. It says that even though the Seventh Circuit generally upheld Wisconsin’s law that requires voters at the polls to show a government photo-ID, that doesn’t mean that the law is valid for all voters. The Seventh Circuit remands the case to the U.S. District Court, and makes it plain that the U.S. District Court should give relief to voters who cannot produce such ID. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the news.