South Carolina Senator Vincent Sheheen (D-Camden) has introduced SB 204, concerning presidential primaries. Currently, the government pays most of the expenses of presidential primaries for parties that polled at least 5% of the presidential vote in the last election. The bill would require such parties to confer and agree on a common date for their presidential primaries. If they can’t come to an agreement, the presidential primaries would either be held in June, or else the parties would be required to pay all the administrative expenses.

In 2012, the Republican primary was January 21 and Democrats didn’t have a presidential primary. In 2008, Republicans had a presidential primary on January 19 and Democrats had theirs on January 26. Obviously it costs much more when the two primaries are held on different days. Thanks to FrontloadingHQ for this news.

This New York Daily News editorial says the New York voter registration form should be redesigned to lessen the chances of confusion between independent voters and members of the Independence Party. The editorial wants the form to first ask voters if they do or do not wish to enroll in a party, with “Yes” or “No” boxes. Then, underneath the “Yes” box, the editorial suggests a list of all the qualified parties with their own checkbox. The editorial writer is confident that such a change would reduce the number of voters who enroll in the Independence Party.

Ironically, though, the California voter registration form was changed some years ago to carry out the recommendation, but the change did not slow the steady rise of the number of Californians who register into the American Independent Party. The California form asks, “Do you want to disclose a political party preference?” and has checkboxes for “Yes” and “No.” Under the “yes” choice, the qualified parties are listed. Nevertheless, the American Independent Party grew from having 2.39% of the state’s registered voters in September 2010, to 2.70% in October 2014.

It seems that many voters like the idea of being members of a party of fellow independents. Thanks to Michael Drucker for the link.

State legislators in North Dakota and Maine have started the process of introducing ballot access improvement bills. In North Dakota, Rep. Corey Mock (D-Grand Forks) has asked the bill-drafting staff to prepare a bill that would eliminate the unique North Dakota requirement that a party must attract a certain number of voters into its primary, in order to nominate. North Dakota has open primaries. All parties must nominate by primary. Primary candidates for the legislature must receive, typically, 130 votes in their own party’s primary in order to be nominated. That may sound like a small number, but there are often only about 2,500 voters in a single legislative district who vote in primaries. It is unrealistic to expect many voters to choose the primary ballot of a minor party. The requirement has prevented any minor party candidates for the legislature from appearing on the November ballot ever since 1976.

In Maine, Rep. Ben Chipman (I-Portland) has submitted a proposal to the bill-drafting staff to ease the number of signatures needed for candidates to get on the primary ballot of a small ballot-qualified party. Current Maine law does not permit anyone but a party member to sign a petition to put a candidate on a partisan primary ballot. Furthermore, Maine law doesn’t take into account the fact that the number of registered voters in various parties differs widely. The law requires 2,000 signatures for statewide candidates and 1,000 for U.S. House. The existing law has prevented all ballot-qualified minor parties from having any congressional candidates whatsoever, for approximately 90 years. The Reform Party was qualified 1996 through 2000 and had no candidates for any federal or state office in its primary the entire period, except for one legislative candidate in 1998. The Green Party manages to place candidates on its primary ballot for the legislature, but has never had any members qualify for the primary ballot who were running for Congress, and only twice managed to place a gubernatorial candidate on its own primary ballot, in 2002 and 2006. The Chipman bill would set a ceiling on the number of signatures needed to get on the primary ballot, of 1% of that party’s registered members.