Idaho Bill to Require That Any Person Who Spends Any Amount of Money on Speech Advocating Election of a Candidate Must Identify Self

The Idaho House State Affairs Committee has introduced HB 259. It says that any person who spends any amount of money whatsoever for a message advocating the election or defeat of any candidate, or any ballot measure, must identify the person responsible for the mssage. Furthermore, the political party of the person responsible for the message must be disclosed.

The bill covers newspapers, magazines, websites, text messages, yard signs, bumper stickers, pamphlets, display cards, posters, and buttons.
Here is the text.

The bill appears to be unconstitutional under the 1995 U.S. Supreme Court decision McIntyre v Ohio Election Commission.

North Dakota Bill to Establish Voter Registration is Defeated

On February 14, the North Dakota House Government and Veterans Affairs Committee defeated HB 1287, which would have set up voter registration. North Dakota is the only state without voter registration. The Secretary of State had opposed the bill, saying it is expensive, bad for voters, and unnecessary. When people vote in North Dakota, they simply show ID that contains their address.

Wyoming Bill for Party Labels in School Board Races Advances

On February 6, the Wyoming Senate passed SF 98, which says that in school board races, the party affiliation of each candidate should be listed. On February 12, the Wyoming House Corporations Committee also passed it.

There would be no party nominees in school board races, so the labels don’t mean that the party approves of any particular candidate.

Wyoming doesn’t permit voters to register into non-qualified parties. The voter registration form doesn’t have a blank line for party choice; it just has checkboxes for the qualified parties, plus a box to register as independent.

New Hampshire Bills to Move the Non-Presidential Primary to an Earlier Date Would Harm Ballot Access

Bills have been introduced in both houses of the New Hampshire primary to move the non-presidential primaries from September to earlier dates. HB 481, with five sponsors, moves it to the second Tuesday in June. SB 222, with two sponsors, does the same. HB 408, with two sponsors, moves it to late August.

The deadlines for independent candidates, and the nominees of unqualified parties, to file declarations of candidacy and petitions, are tied to the date of the non-presidential primary. If the state moved the primary to June, and didn’t decouple the independent deadlines, independents would need to file a declaration of candidacy as early as March. Even presidential independents must file, so that would be unconstitutional under Anderson v Celebrezze.