U.S. District Court Says it Appears Utah Requires Too Many Signatures for Candidates Seeking Place on Primary Ballot

On February 5, U.S. District Court Judge David Nuffer issued an order in Utah Republican Party v Cox, 2:16cv-38. The order says it appears that the number of signatures needed for candidates to get on a primary ballot are so high they are unconstitutional. The order also suggests it is unconstitutional to require that voters can only sign for one candidate for the same office.

The order says, “It seems that if the law provides a path to the ballot, that path should be free of constitutional infirmity.” This is because the state had argued that it doesn’t matter if the petitions are too difficult; that a candidate who has support at a party caucus doesn’t need any petition at all. The judge rejects that argument.

Utah candidates who try to get on the primary ballot with signatures need 28,000 for statewide office, 7,000 for U.S. House, 2,000 for State Senate, and 1,000 for State House. The judge says when one calculates the petition burden as a percentage of the eligible voters, the percentages are far too high to be constitutional (only registered party members can sign). In one extreme example, a candidate for State House would need signatures from 57% of the eligible signers. The order is not final and the judge has asked if either side has any additional arguments or citations to submit.

Already, the legislature has responded. On Sunday, March 6, Representative Kraig Powell (R-Heber City) introduced HB 481, to lower the primary petitions to 2% of the eligible signers, and to permit voters to sign for more than one candidate for the same nomination.

New York State Court Says Challenge to Ted Cruz Spot on Presidential Primary Ballots was Filed Too Late

On Monday, March 7, a New York state trial court ruled that the challenge to Ted Cruz’s spot on the Republican primary ballot was filed too late and therefore cannot be considered. The challenge concerned presidential qualifications. So far, every lawsuit so far this year on presidential qualifications that has been adjudicated has been dismissed for technical problems. See this story.

New York Sets Legislative Hearing for Bill to Simplify General Election Ballot

The New York Assembly Election Law Committee will hold a hearing on AB 3218 on Wednesday, March 9, at 9 a.m. The bill removes party emblems (also called logos) from the November ballot. Election officials in New York know that their state has general election ballots that are very confusing and difficult to read, but when they try to design better ballots, they are hampered by various election laws that make it difficult to design a clear ballot. One of those laws is the requirement that each candidate have a tiny party emblem next to his or her name. Also the party emblem must be printed at the top of each party column. Removing the emblems will give more flexibility for ballot redesign.

The sponsors of AB 3218 are three Democrats, Assembly members Patricia Fahy, Thomas Abinanti, and David Buchwald. An identical bill in the Senate, SB 3953, is sponsored by Republican Senator Richard Funke. A similar bill passed the Assembly in 2014 but did not advance in the State Senate.