California Libertarian Party Will Allow Independents to vote In Presidential Primary, for First Time

The California Libertarian Party has told the Secretary of State that independent voters will be able to choose a Libertarian presidential primary ballot in June. This is the first time the California Libertarian Party has made that decision. The only time that independent voters ever before voted in a California Libertarian presidential primary was 2000, when all voters could vote for any presidential candidate from any party, because in 2000 California had a blanket presidential primary.

The Democratic and American Independent Parties in California are also allowing independent voters to vote in their presidential primaries in 2016. The California Democratic Party has always allowed independents to vote in its presidential primaries, starting in 2000. The AIP in the past also let independent voters vote in its presidential primary, with the sole exception of 2012.

New Mexico Proposed Constitutional Amendment for Semi-Closed Primaries

Two New Mexico Representatives have introduced HJR 12, to require semi-closed primaries. Currently New Mexico has closed primaries. The proposed constitutional amendment would provide that independent voters be allowed to vote in partisan primaries. The authors are Representative Moe Maestas (D-Albuquerque) and Stephanie Garcia Richard (D-Los Alamos). If the legislature passes it, then the voters would be asked to decide whether it should become part of the State Constitution. Thanks to Carol Miller for this news.

Minor Parties Win Procedural Victory in South Dakota Ballot Access Case

On January 26, U.S. District Court Judge Karen Schreier ruled that the Libertarian and Constitution Parties challenge to South Dakota’s early petition deadline for new parties may proceed. The two parties filed a lawsuit on June 15, 2015, against the new law that said petitions to create a new party are due the first Tuesday of March. The 2015 session of the legislature had moved that deadline to the first Tuesday of March; the old deadline had been the last Tuesday of March.

After the case was filed, the new law was suspended by a successful referendum petition. Therefore, the parties asked the court to amend their complaint, to challenge the old law, which they felt was almost as bad. Whether the deadline is March 1 or March 29, the work must either be done in severe winter weather, or must be done in the year before the election.

The court order grants permission for the case to continue as a challenge to the March 29 deadline. It also says the parties have standing even though, when the case was filed, they had not yet begun petitioning (although, in all the months since the case was filed, they have been petitioning).

Los Angeles Times Editorial Says “Having More Choices on the Ballot is Usually a Good Thing”

The Los Angeles Times has this editorial about a possible Bloomberg run for the presidency. The editorial says, “Having more choices on the ballot is usually a good thing.” That is significant, because both in 2004 and 2010, the Los Angeles Times supported top-two ballot measures, which confine the general election ballot to only two choices.

Kelly Gneitling, Leader of Independent American Party, Gets Publicity for his Sumo Challenge to Governor Chris Christie

The Oregonian, Oregon’s largest newspaper, has this story with a video link about Kelly Gneitling, a founder of the Independent American Party. Gneitling is a sumo wrestler and he is part of the group that is occupying a federal office in eastern Oregon, in a protest over federal government land policies.

Gneitling challenges Governor Chris Christie to a sumo wrestling match. In 2014, the Independent American Party took over the Americans Elect Party in Arizona, and Gneitling was its nominee for State Senate in Arizona’s northeast corner. In a two-person race, Gneitling, with the Americans Elect label, polled 16.29%. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.