Tennessee Secretary of State Web Page Appears to Retract Claim that Presidential Candidates who run in the Presidential Primary Can’t Then be Independent Candidates

The Tennessee Secretary of State’s web page has been altered recently. On December 22, 2015, it said that presidential primary candidates can’t be independent presidential candidates in November. But the same portion of that page now (as of December 25, 2015) says only that they can’t be nominees of a different political party; it no longer says they can’t be independent candidates. See that page here.

The page might have been changed because it was pointed out that Tennessee let John B. Anderson run as an independent in November 1980 even though he had run in the Tennessee Republican presidential primary the same year. Also in 2012 Tennessee let Gary Johnson run as an independent in November 2012 even though he had run in the Tennessee Republican presidential primary the same year.

Lindsey Graham’s Name Will Appear on Republican Presidential Primary in at Least Eleven States

Lindsey Graham withdrew from the Republican presidential race on December 21. On the same day, he removed his name from the South Carolina Republican presidential primary ballot. But he did not act to remove his name from the primary ballots of any other states, and it is now impossible to do so in eleven states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

He still has time to withdraw from Florida, Idaho, and Ohio, if he wishes to. In Alabama, if he notifies the state that he has withdrawn, votes for him won’t be counted even though his name will remain on the ballot.

Tennessee Secretary of State Says Presidential Primary Candidates Can’t be Independents, Even Though the Same Secretary of State in 2012 Let Gary Johnson do Both

Tre Hargett has been Secretary of State of Tennessee since before the 2012 election. In 2012, Gary Johnson was on the Republican presidential primary ballot in Tennessee, and he also qualified as an independent presidential candidate in Tennessee in November 2012.

But this year, he has posted a comment on his web page, saying once a candidate’s name appears on the presidential primary ballot, he cannot qualify as an independent presidential candidate. When he was asked why he had a different policy in 2012, he said he put Johnson’s name on the November ballot “in an abundance of caution.” He said Tennessee was being sued over ballot access in 2012. It is true that in early 2012, a U.S. District Cort struck down the state’s requirements for new parties to get on the ballot, but that lawsuit had absolutely nothing to do with the Libertarian Party, or independent candidates, or the state’s sore loser laws. Furthermore, that same minor party ballot access case is still pending. The Sixth Circuit remanded it back to the U.S. District Court, which could issue an opinion at any time.

Hargett also did not explain why Tennessee let John Anderson on the ballot in November 1980 as an independent, even though Anderson had run in the Republican presidential primary in Tennessee in 1980. This is one more sad example of the arbitrary application of ballot access interpretation in the United States.

There are two reasons why states cannot impose sore loser laws on presidential primaries. One is that Article II of the U.S. Constitution, and federal law, makes it clear that the presidential electors are the true candidates in November. Then, in December, the electors choose the president. That is why the November ballot in Tennessee says, for example, “Electors for Mitt Romney”, “Electors for Barack Obama”, etc.

The other reason is that no one is defeated for a presidential nomination in the presidential primary of a single state. Hargett is a Republican.