Arizona Referendum Petition Has Enough Valid Signatures to be on November 2014 Ballot

On October 23, the Arizona Secretary of State determined that the referendum petition concerning HB 2305 has enough valid signatures to be on the November 2014 ballot. See this story. HB 2305 is an omnibus election law bill. Among other things, it makes it virtually impossible for a member of a small ballot-qualified party to get on his or her own party’s primary ballot. And it makes it literally impossible for a small ballot-qualified party to nominate candidates by write-in at its own primary.

As a result of the success of the petition drive, HB 2305 can’t go into effect in 2014. Voters will vote in 2014 on whether to repeal the law. Even if voters vote to keep the law, it can’t affect the 2014 election.

Collecting over 100,000 signatures was only possible because other parts of HB 2305 are considered damaging to voters who are inclined to vote for Democratic Party nominees. Therefore, the Arizona Democratic Party and its allies are responsible for collecting most of the signatures. Arizona and Ohio are two states in which the Democratic Party has been a force for fair ballot access laws, during 2013. In Ohio, Senate Democrats were united in opposing SB 193 this month, and for supporting an amendment to lower the petition for newly-qualifying parties from 56,000 signatures to 2,000 signatures. Of course, in both Arizona and Ohio, Democrats are in the minority in both houses of the legislature. The fate of Ohio’s SB 193 will be determined in the coming week, when the Ohio House takes up the bill.

“Stop Watching Us” Coalition Holds Large Rally in Washington, D.C., on October 26

The “Stop Watching Us” Coalition holds a large rally in Washington, D.C., on October 26. The coalition, which contains approximately 100 groups, includes the Libertarian Party and the Green Party, but no other political parties. See here for more information about the Coalition and the rally. UPDATE: see this story, and this one.

New Jersey Trial Court Upholds Discriminatory Ballot Format

On October 25, the New Jersey Superior Court in Atlantic County upheld that county’s general election ballot format, a format that strongly discriminates against candidates other than the Democratic and Republican nominees. The two major parties each have their own party column. All other candidates are squeezed into a column headed by “Nomination by Petition” on the far right-hand side of the ballot. The case, Stein v McGettigan, will be appealed.

The plaintiff, Gary Stein, is an independent candidate for Assembly, 2nd district, in the November 5, 2013 election. He had filed the case on July 15, 2013, but for some reason it was not heard until it would have been too late for any relief anyway.

New Jersey has not had any ballot-qualified parties other than the Democratic and Republican Parties ever since the definition of “political party” was amended in 1920. There is no other state with a historical record that restrictive. The law requires a group to have polled 10% of all the votes cast for lower house of the state legislature, for its nominees for state legislature. New Jersey is the only state that has ever had a vote test that excludes all the statewide offices.

See this story about the court hearing. As the article notes, not all counties in New Jersey use a discriminatory ballot format. State law permits each county to design its own general election ballot.

Survey USA Poll on Kansas 2014 Gubernatorial Race

On October 25, Survey USA released a poll on the Kansas 2014 gubernatorial race. The results: Sam Brownback (incumbent Republican) 39%, Paul Davis (Democrat) 43%, “third party ticket” 12%, undecided 6%. See more details here, including breakdowns by race, sex, age, and party affiliation.

The only party on the Kansas ballot currently, other than the Democratic and Republican Parties, is the Libertarian Party. The likely Democratic nominee, Paul Davis, is the minority leader in the Kansas House.

The Reform Party was removed from the Kansas ballot earlier this year by the Secretary of State, but the Secretary of State’s action violated precedent, and if the Reform Party were to file a lawsuit, it would have a good chance of winning. However, to date, as far as is known, the Reform Party has not fought the ruling. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.