Canadian Appeals Court Upholds Law Barring Canadian Citizens from Voting in Canada Elections if the Have Been Outside Canada for More than 5 Years

On July 20, a Canadian Appeals Court upheld a Canadian election law that bars Canadian citizens from voting if they have lived permanently outside Canada for more than five years. The lower court had struck the law down. The case will probably be appealed to the Canadian Supreme Court.

There is no such law in the United States, and some U.S. citizens have lived in foreign countries for up to fifty years or more and yet continue to vote absentee. But U.S. citizens can’t vote absentee if they move to a U.S. possession.

See this story. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Ann Arbor City Council Defeats Measure to Ask Voters if They Prefer Non-Partisan City Elections

Ann Arbor, Michigan has partisan elections for city office. On the evening of July 20, the city council voted down a proposal to let the voters decide if non-partisan elections should replace them. Supporters of non-partisan elections may do a city initiative, however. See this story.

In the 1970’s, the Human Rights Party, which was a ballot-qualified party in Michigan, won several seats on the Ann Arbor city council, but now the council is entirely composed of Democrats.

Private Group Implements Lottery; All Voters are Eligible; The Lucky Winner gets $25,000

A recent Los Angeles School Board runoff election in one district had an usual feature: a private group had said every voter who voted in that particular race would have his or her name entered into a lottery, and the winner would get $25,000. This Los Angeles Times story describes the event. The initial winner is a woman who declined the money, so the lottery organizers then drew a second name. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Congressman John Delaney Speaks About His Top-Two Bill, HR 2655

On July 15, Congressman John Delaney (D-Maryland) spoke about his HB 2655, which mandates top-two primaries for congressional elections, and also directs that Congress study redistricting for U.S. House districts. Delaney spoke on the telephone to a conference call audience organized by IndependentVoting. IndependentVoting is the new name for the group that was once the New Alliance Party, then the Patriot Party, then part of the Reform Party, then Committee for a Unified Independent Party.

Here is a link to the entire 28-minute conference call. Congressman Delaney does not mention the top-two part of his bill until the nine minute mark. The only advantage to a top-two primary that he mentions is so that independents can vote in primaries. Neither he, nor hostess Jackie Salit, mentions that independents can also vote in congressional primaries if the state has an open primary, or a semi-closed primary, or a blanket primary. From listening to the call, one would never know that in two-thirds of all U.S. House districts, it is already possible for independent voters to vote in congressional primaries of both major parties, without that voter having to join the party. In still other districts, independents can vote in Democratic congressional primaries but not Republican ones.

When Jackie Salit describes the bill, early in the call, she says it applies to all federal office. But it does not apply to presidential elections.

Congressman Delaney seemed more eager to talk about the part of the bill that would require a study of independent redistricting commissions. Neither he nor anyone mentioned that in November 2014, there were three candidates on the ballot in Delaney’s district: Delaney received 94,704; the Republican received 91,930; and the Green received 3,762. Delaney represents a swing district and he might feel that a top-two system would be better for him personally, because in a top-two system the Green would not have been on the November ballot.