Justice Party National Steering Committee to Meet

The Justice Party has a meeting via conference call for members of its National Steering Committee, on October 5, 2013, to discuss the party’s future. The party only polled 43,018 votes for President in 2012, and it is only ballot-qualified currently in Florida, Mississippi, and Vermont. However, it won two ballot access cases (in California and Vermont) and has a third pending in Hawaii.

The party had some publicity recently in Wyoming. This Star-Tribune story mentions that a Justice Party activist has moved to Wyoming and hopes to organize the party in that state.

New Los Angeles County Registration Data

The California Secretary of State does not furnish any statewide registration tallies in odd years, except for one near the beginning of the year. But Los Angeles County keeps a running tally, which is available at any time on the county’s web page.

The September 10 registration tally for Los Angeles County shows that the total number of registered voters is virtually the same as it was on July 7. The number of independent voters has declined, but the number of registered voters in the Peace & Freedom, American Independent, and Libertarian Parties has increased. The other four qualified parties dropped. The number of voters in unqualified parties, which is combined with the number of voters who ignore the question about party membership, has increased.

The September 10 totals for Los Angeles County are: Democratic 2,454,773; Republican 1,032,775; American Independent 108,275; Peace & Freedom 31,838; Libertarian 25,882; Green 24,473; Americans Elect 2,471; declines to state 854,712; miscellaneous parties and also voters who leave the question blank 290,557; total 4,825,756.

The July 7 totals were: Democratic 2,458,609; Republican 1,036,437; American Independent 108,031; Peace & Freedom 28,560; Libertarian 25,739; Green 24,521; Americans Elect 2,495; declines to state 860,723; miscellaneous parties and also voters who leave the form blank 280,092; total 4,825,207.

New Jersey Governor Vetoes Bill to Move 2013 Election from November 5 to October 16

On the afternoon of September 9, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie vetoed AB 4237, a bill that the legislature had passed in June. The bill moved the state election (for 2013 only) from November 5 to October 16. Since the Governor already set the special U.S. Senate election for October 16, moving the election for state office would have saved $12,000,000 in election administration costs. September 9 was the deadline for the Governor to act. If he had done nothing, the bill would have taken effect.

The veto message said that voters would be confused if the state election were moved from November to October. Of course, if he had signed it soon after it passed, there would have been ample opportunity to educate voters that there was only going to be one election this year, in October. See this story.

California Repeals All Residency Requirements for Petition Circulators

On September 9, California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 213, which repeals all residency requirements for petitioners. This will settle two pending lawsuits that had been filed against California. One is Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County v Bowen, now pending in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. The other case, technically, is nineteen different lawsuits, all filed by Wisconsin resident Robert Raymond against nineteen separate counties. Those cases are pending in U.S. District Courts in Sacramento and San Francisco.

Opening Brief Filed in Ninth Circuit Over Who Can Register to Vote in Guam Election Over Political Status of the Island

On September 3, Arnold Davis filed his opening brief in the Ninth Circuit in Davis v Guam, 13-15199. The issue is who should be allowed to register to vote, in an upcoming election over the future political relationship between Guam and the United States. Guam law says such a vote will be held as soon as at least 70% of the eligible voters have registered to vote. The Guam law also says that no one can register for this election unless they are descended from people who lived on Guam in 1899. The intent of that part of the law is to confine the election to the Chamorro people who were the traditional residents of Guam for centuries into the past.

Davis is a full-time resident of Guam who is permitted to vote in other Guam elections, but not the upcoming election on the status of the island because his ancestors didn’t live in Guam. The U.S. District Court ruled against him on the grounds that because the date of the election has not been set, and may never be set, his case is not ripe.