Op-Ed Discusses Independent Party of Oregon’s Impact on 2016 Election

This op-ed in The Oregonian discusses the Independent Party’s impact on the Oregon elections of 2016. The author, Tim Nesbitt, speculates that because the Independent Party will probably have a government-administered primary, and because the Oregon Independent Party will let independent voters vote in its primary, that may put pressure on the two major parties to also let independent voters vote in their primaries.

The op-ed does not mention that both major parties in the past let independent voters vote in their primaries. The Democrats allowed that in 1998 and 2000. The Republicans allowed it in 2002.

The op-ed also mentions HB 2177, now pending in the legislature. It would put people on the voter rolls automatically if they have a drivers license or state ID card. But, if it passes, chances are the Independent Party will slip below 5% of the total state registration, and won’t have a government primary in 2018. That is because, if the bill passes, all those new voters will automatically be listed as independent voters, not as party members, unless they respond to an inquiry asking if they want to be members of a party. Because there will be so many newly-registered voters, probably the Independent Party’s registration, as a percentage of the entire registered electorate, will slip. The Independent Party has already noticed this and has expressed concerns HB 2177.

February 2015 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
February 1, 2015 – Volume 30, Number 9

This issue was printed on white paper.


Table of Contents

  1. BALLOT ACCESS BILLS INTRODUCED IN SIX STATES
  2. SOUTH DAKOTA BILL MAY BE AMENDED TO EASE DEADLINE
  3. STRAIGHT-TICKET BILLS
  4. VIRGINIA BALLOT ACCESS BILLS LOSE
  5. PENNSYLVANIA BALLOT ACCESS CHAMPION GAINS KEY POST
  6. TWO EVENTS BOLSTER MORE INCLUSIVE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES
  7. PROCEDURAL VICTORY FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE BALLOT ACCESS CASE
  8. COURT UPHOLDS VIRGINIA’S DISCRIMINATORY BALLOT FORMAT
  9. U.S. DISTRICT COURT UPHOLDS CALIFORNIA WRITE-IN BAN
  10. MONTANA REPUBLICAN PARTY LEGAL SETBACK
  11. MORE LAWSUIT NEWS
  12. 2014 VOTE FOR GOVERNOR
  13. 2014 VOTE FOR LOWER HOUSE OF STATE LEGISLATURE
  14. VIRGINIA ELECTS AN INDEPENDENT TO LEGISLATURE
  15. MARYLAND GREENS ARE ON BALLOT
  16. N.Y. WORKING FAMILIES PARTY HAS ITS BEST VOTE SHOWING EVER, FOR OFFICE OTHER THAN GOVERNOR
  17. LIBERTARIANS ARE ONLY PARTY THAT FILED INTENT TO QUALIFY IN MAINE
  18. CONSTITUTION PARTY GAINS AN ALABAMA OFFICE-HOLDER
  19. STOP COMMON CORE PARTY SAYS IT WILL CHANGE ITS NAME TO “REFORM”
  20. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

North Dakota House Passes Bill to Require Special Elections for U.S. Senate

On February 24, the North Dakota House passed HB 1181. It requires a special election when there is a vacant U.S. Senate seat. In 36 states, including currently in North Dakota, when a U.S. Senate seat becomes vacant, the Governor appoints a new Senator. The new Senator then serves until the next regularly-scheduled congressional election. See this story.

Maine Ballot Access Bill Has Hearing March 9, Monday

Maine LD 507 will be heard in the Joint Committee on State and Local Government on Monday, March 9, at 10 a.m., in room 437 of the State House. This is the bill that sets a cap on the number of signatures needed for a candidate to get on the primary ballot of a party. The requirement could not be greater than 1% of any particular party’s registration. In Maine, only members of parties can sign primary petitions, and it is almost impossible for a small ballot-qualified party to comply with the existing law for statewide office and U.S. House. Those petitions are 2,000 signatures and 1,000 signatures, respectively.

No Maine ballot-qualified party, other than the Democratic and Republican Parties, in the last 80 years, has been able to comply with the existing law for either House of Congress. With great difficulty, the Green Party has complied with the existing law twice for Governor. Thanks to Thomas MacMillan for this news.