On October 16, two Ohio Representatives introduced HB 305, which would change voter registration forms. Current Ohio forms do not ask the applicant to choose a party, or to choose independent status. The bill would put that question on voter registration forms.

The bill may have been introduced to clear up the ongoing ambiguity in Ohio election law over who can qualify as an independent candidate. Current law says an independent candidate is anyone who submits a valid petition and who does not consider himself or herself a member of a qualified party. But Ohio courts have made a muddle of this law, and have established precedents that the way to determine if someone considers himself or herself an independent is to delve into the candidate’s behavior and associations.

If the bill passed, it would take effect January 1, 2017. The voter registration form would include a blank line, for the purpose of letting a voter register into a party that had not been qualified when that form had been printed. However, it appears the authors of the bill did not intend to let voters register into unqualified parties. The bill does not address whether a qualified party that goes off the ballot still retains its registered members, nor does it address whether parties can choose to invite registered independents to vote in its primaries.

The bill would require a candidate in a primary to have registered into that particular party at least 30 days before the deadline to get on the primary ballot. Voters could change party affiliation at any time, except that they could not change party membership at the polls on primary day or within 30 days of a primary. Someone who wants to be an independent candidate could apparently switch to independent status the very day of filing the independent candidate petition. If this bill were enacted, it would clearly make it easier for anyone to qualify as an independent candidate. The authors of the bill are Representative Paul Becker (R-Union Township) and Representative Ron Hood (R-Ashville).

The bill would make it somewhat more difficult for an individual to get on a primary ballot, because the only individuals who could sign a primary petition would be registered members of that party. Currently, a primary petition can be signed by individuals who didn’t vote in the last primary or individuals who voted in the last primary in that same party, which is a bigger pool of potential signers. Here is the text of the bill. Thanks to Kevin Knedler for the news about the bill.

On October 18, the forces who filed a referendum petition last month against Arizona’s HB 2305 sued three Arizona counties. The various counties are carrying out a validity check on the petition. The plaintiffs argue that the counties are disqualifying more signatures than they should. See this story.

If the referendum petition is successful, the voters will vote in November 2014 on whether or not to repeal HB 2305. HB 2305 is the omnibus election law bill that, among other things, made it extremely difficult for minor party members to get themselves on their own party’s primary ballot. It also makes it literally impossible for the smaller qualified parties to nominate anyone in their own primary by write-in vote.

Syracuse, New York elects a Mayor in a partisan election on November 5, 2013. The only candidates are Democratic incumbent Stephanie Miner, Green Party nominee Kevin Bott, and Conservative Party nominee Ian Hunter. Republicans did not nominate anyone.

According to this story in the Syracuse Post-Standard, famous conservative commentator Glenn Beck recently criticized Bott, although the criticism does not mention Bott’s candidacy.

The three candidates for Mayor have been invited to a debate on October 28. Bott and Hunter have accepted, but so far Mayor Miner has refused. The October 28 debate is the only one scheduled for this election.