Last week, the Ohio Libertarian Party filed this brief in its ongoing ballot access lawsuit, which was filed in 2013 to overturn the 2013 law that altered the definition of a “political party.” The case is Libertarian Party of Ohio v Husted, s.d., 2:13cv-953.
The brief argues that the Ohio Constitution requires that all parties nominate by primary. The 2013 law says newly-qualifying parties must nominate by convention.
The brief also argues that it is unconstitutional for a state to let voters register into qualified parties, but not unqualified parties. Ohio voter registration forms do not ask voters to choose a party (or independent status). Instead, Ohio considers a voter to be a member of a party when that voter votes in that party’s primary. With no more primaries for newly-qualifying parties, voters won’t be able to join those parties in the eyes of the state. Courts that have ruled that if states let voters register into a qualified party, they must let voters into active unqualified parties, include the Second Circuit, the Tenth Circuit, a U.S. District Court in Oklahoma, and a state appeals court in New Jersey.
According to this news story, the current Republican Secretary of State, Jon Husted, who is running for re-election, supports the 2013 law. The Democratic nominee, Nina Turner, opposes it. The third candidate in the race, Libertarian Kevin Knedler, also opposes the 2013 law, although the news story does not mention him.