FEC Will Soon Decide Whether the Socialist Workers Party May Continue to be Exempt from Campaign Reporting

On February 14, the Federal Election Commission held a public discussion on whether to extend the campaign finance reporting exemption for the Socialist Workers Party. Apparently the Commission has not come to a conclusion. Here is a link to two proposed determinations, prepared by staff for the Commissioners.

Draft “A” is 21 pages and grants the exemption. Draft “B” is 23 pages and denies the exemption. Much of the material in each draft is the same, but Draft “A” finds harassment experienced by the party to be serious enough to justify an extension, while Draft “B” discusses the same harassment but downplays it. Draft “B”, on page 21, says the party should be required to disclose its contributors because possibly some insincere individuals will contribute massively to the party to “take votes away” from certain major candidates. This is a foolish fear, because if there were such insincere individuals, they would not contribute directly to the SWP; they would instead make independent expenditures, much as some Democrats made independent expenditures to help gain votes for the Montana Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate last year. Of course, independent expenditures have nothing to do with the kind of campaign reports that the SWP would be making if the party didn’t have an exemption. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.

Pennsylvania Photo Voter-ID Law Won’t Be Enforced for May 2013 Primary

Last year, Pennsylvania passed a law requiring voters at the polls to show government photo-ID at the polls. The law was not enforced in 2012 because a state court ruled that voters had not been given enough time to learn about the new requirement. According to this story, the law won’t be enforced for the May 2013 primary either, pending a trial on the constitutionality of the law.

West Virginia Ballot Access Bill Introduced

West Virginia Delegate Mike Manypenny (D-Grafton) has introduced HB 2032, to make it easier for a party to become or remain ballot-qualified. Current law requires a party to have polled 1% for Governor to be a qualified party. The bill would say a party is a group that has polled at least 1% for any statewide office.

If this bill had been law in 1996, the Reform Party would have attained party status in West Virginia after the November 1996 election. The Reform Party never had qualified status in West Virginia, even though it was a qualified party immediately after the 1996 election in 32 states. Thanks to Jeff Becker for this news.

Six Georgia Legislators Introduce Resolution Asking Congress to End Popular Elections for U.S. Senate

Six Georgia legislators have introduced HR 273, which asks Congress to repeal the 17th Amendment. The 17th Amendment, which went into effect in 1914, created popular elections for U.S. Senators. Before the 17th Amendment, state legislators chose U.S. Senators.

The six sponsors are Representatives Buzz Brockaway, Kevin Cooke, Mike Dudgeon, Delvis Dutton, Josh Clark, and Dustin Hightower.

South Dakota Bill Converts Nomination Process for Certain State Offices from Convention to Primary

On February 15, the South Dakota Senate State Affairs passed SB 82 by a vote of 7-1. It changes the method by which qualified parties nominate for Secretary of State, Attorney General, Auditor, Treasurer, Land Commissioner, and Public Utilities Commissioner. Currently, parties nominate by convention for those offices. The bill changes that to nomination by primary.