Virginia Bill Introduced to Ease Presidential Candidate Ballot Access, in both Primaries and General Election

Virginia State Senator Richard H. Black (R-Great Falls) has introduced SB 690, to lower the number of signatures for presidential candidates from 10,000 signatures to 5,000 signatures. The bill also reduces the number of signatures needed in each U.S. House district from 400 to 200. The bill would apply both to presidential primary candidates, and candidates of unqualified parties and independent presidential candidates petitioning for the November ballot.

Virginia Delegate Mark Cole (R-Fredericksburg) has introduced HB 1346, which lowers the number of signatures to 5,000 for presidential primary candidates, but not general election presidential candidates.

New York Times Will Publish Dialogue on Whether a New Political Party is Useful

The print edition of the New York Times for December 12 has this letter by Teed Rockwell, advocating that U.S. voters support a new political party. The Times chose this letter, not only to be printed, but to be the subject of a readers dialogue. The Times will publish some reader responses to the Rockwell letter on Sunday, December 16.

Virginia Bill to Give Each Congressional District its Own Presidential Elector

Virginia State Senator Charles Carrico (R-Grayson) has introduced SB 723. It would give each U.S. House district its own presidential elector. It would also give the state’s two at-large presidential electors to the presidential candidate who carried the most U.S. House districts. The bill has no provision for dealing with a situation in which the number of congressional elections carried by various presidential candidates is tied. Although Virginia has eleven districts now, in the future it might have an even number of districts. See this story about the bill. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news. UPDATE: the bill does have a procedure for dealing with a situation in which the number of congressional districts carried by each of two candidates is tied; in that event the presidential candidate who won the most popular votes in the state would get the two at-large electors. Thanks to Jim Riley for this correction.

California Congressmen Brad Sherman and Howard Berman Spent $11,700,000 in their Election Race Against Each Other

The Hill writes here that California Democratic Congressmen Brad Sherman and Howard Berman spent $11,700,000 in their campaigns against each other to represent the California 30th district. This is the most expensive California U.S. House race ever, when independent expenditures are excluded.

They were both incumbents, forced to run against each other by redistricting. The top-two system did not cause them to run against each other; redistricting did that. But without the top-two system, their race against each other would have been over in the June primary. The top-two system forced them to run against each other in June and in November as well, and thus the top-two system contributed to the record amount spent.