According to this story, at least three Republican presidential elector candidates say, if they are elected, they may vote for someone other than Mitt Romney. The story mentions elector candidates by name from Iowa, Nevada, and Texas. Of these three, the Texas elector’s statement has the most punch, because the Texas Republican electors are considered certain to be elected. Thanks to John Koza for the link.
On Wednesday, September 12, a panel of three Commonwealth Court Judges heard arguments over whether Libertarian signatures on the Pennsylvania statewide petition are valid or invalid if (1) the voter moved since registering to vote, and signed the petition with the new address; (2) if the signer entered the month and day but not “2012” in the “date” column. See this AP story on the hearing. A decision is expected Thursday, September 13. However, whichever side loses is expected to appeal to the State Supreme Court. While that happens, the grueling process of verifying signatures will begin again on Monday, September 17.
On Tuesday, September 11, U.S. District Court Lawrence Stengel heard arguments in Constitution Party of Pennsylvania v Aichele, 5:12-cv-2726. This is the case in which the Constitution, Green, and Libertarian Parties attack the Pennsylvania fee-challenge system, which puts petitioning groups at risk of being liable for as much as $110,000 if their petitions are rejected. Judge Stengel had jurisdiction over a similar case, filed by the same parties, back in 2009. He dismissed that case on ripeness and standing. At the beginning of the oral argument, he asked, “Didn’t I uphold this law before?” He had to be reminded that his first decision did not reach the merits of the case. The precedents are so strong that the system is unconstitutional, the state and the intervenors (the Republican challengers) have never put forth any theory in their briefs as to how it could be constitutional. But they tried very hard to persuade the judge to abstain on the grounds that the constitutional issues should be aired in the state courts. Judge Stengel seemed tempermentally inclined to want to abstain, but there are substantial legal arguments that say abstention would be legally improper.
On September 12, the Michigan Secretary of State filed her response in Gelineau v Ruth Johnson, western district, 1:12-cv-976. Her brief says that it would be too difficult and expensive to add any Libertarian presidential candidate to the ballot. Of course, the reason there is little time left is that she didn’t tell the Libertarian Party that she would not print the name of Gary E. Johnson of Texas on the ballot until the end of the day on Friday, September 7. The party had made this request to her in June and she refused to answer for approximately 90 days, even though the party repeatedly asked for her to rule sooner.
She also has not yet said if write-in votes for Gary Johnson would be counted, even though he filed as a declared write-in candidate. And she has not yet answered the question of whether the Libertarian Party’s vice-presidential candidate can be on the ballot, and whether she recognizes that the Libertarian Party candidates for presidential elector are valid candidates.
Her brief says, “Needless to say, it is difficult to believe that Plaintiffs have a valid and legitimate interest in participation in the political process, ballot access, the unfettered right to the candidate of their choosing, etc., when they also assert an interest in ‘getting back’ at the Secretary of State for following Michigan law in barring the ‘original’ Gary Johnson from the ballot.” However, plaintiffs have not said anything in any legal papers about “getting back” at the Secretary of State. The state’s brief also says that the original Gary Johnson switched parties “on the eve of a general election”, yet actually Gary Johnson left the Republican Party and registered into the Libertarian Party in December 2011.
Also, the state’s brief says that Gary E. Johnson of Texas “has no chance of being elected the next president of the United States”. Yet five times in the past, Michigan has printed the names of presidential and vice-presidential candidates on the November ballot who were under age 35, and who therefore could not have served.
Shortly before the state’s brief was filed, the Sixth Circuit issued an order in the first ballot access case, declining to halt ballot printing, but maintaining the expedited briefing schedule in the Sixth Circuit for the original case.
Thirteen U.S. House members have been defeated for re-election in partisan primaries this year. The congressional primaries for the year are finally over. They stretched from March 13 to September 11. See this story for more details. Eight of the thirteen lost to other incumbents. This only happens in years following redistricting. None of the defeated incumbents were in states that have held top-two primaries already this year. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.
Free & Equal and its founder, Christina Tobin, organized the only 2008 presidential debate in which every candidate who was on the ballot in states containing a majority of the electoral vote was invited, and in which some of those invited candidates did participate. That debate took place, but only Ralph Nader and Chuck Baldwin participated. Free and Equal also sponsored a 2008 vice-presidential debate, in which the Matt Gonzalez, Wayne Allyn Root, and Darrell Castle participated.
Free & Equal is working for a 2012 presidential debate, to be held in Chicago on Tuesday, October 23, the day after the last Commission on Presidential Debates event is held. Again, candidates who are, or may possibly, be on the ballot in states containing a majority of the electoral vote are invited. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are definitely on the ballot in states containing a majority of the electoral vote, and Virgil Goode may be, if his petition in Nebraska is approved, and his petition in New Hampshire is approved, and if Kansas election officials let the Reform Party place him on the ballot, and if the Independent Party of Delaware nominates him.
