Washington State 2012 Primary May Have Had Lowest Turnout for a Gubernatorial Primary in History

According to this article, an official of the Washington state Secretary of State’s office says the turnout in this month’s primary will be approximately 40%. If the final figures show exactly 40%, or lower, then that will be the lowest turnout in Washington state history in gubernatorial election years, at least back to 1936. Statistics for the number of voters registered in time for primaries, for years before 1936, were not preserved, so no one can calculate precise primary turnout earlier than 1936.

Washington state has always elected its Governors, and its other statewide executive offices, in presidential election years. Turnout (i.e., the number of people who vote in the primary, divided by the number of registered voters at the time of the primary) has been: 1936 64.11%, 1940 61.81%, 1944 44.27%, 1948 43.05%, 1952 53.43%, 1956 51.91%, 1960 49.64%, 1964 55.01%, 1968 44.98%, 1972 49.12%, 1976 43.24%, 1980 46.95%, 1984 40.31%, 1988 40.11%, 1992 45.80%, 1996 42.00%, 2000 40.80%, 2004 45.14%, 2008 42.60%.

Voting in Washington state is easier than ever, because for the first time in a gubernatorial year, this year every county sent every registered voter a ballot in the postal mail. Washington used the top-two system starting in 2008, and proponents insisted that turnout in primaries would rise. No incumbent is running for Governor in 2012, so one would have expected a higher turnout than in 2008, when the incumbent Democratic Governor was running for re-election, so there was no real contest in the Democratic primary in 2008.

Lower Maryland State Court Upholds Internet Method of Distributing Petitions

On August 10, a Maryland circuit court upheld the ability of petitioning groups to make their blank petitions available on the internet, so that anyone with access to a computer can print his or her own copy of the petition, sign the petition, and also sign off as the circulator. This method was pioneered by https://MDpetitions.com. The particular petition at issue in the court case was one to force a referendum on the state’s most recent U.S. House redistricting plan. Democrats, who oppose the referendum, asked the court to invalidate the petitions that were prepared by the web page, but the lower court reject the position of the Democratic Party. The party will now appeal to the highest state court, the Maryland State Court of Appeals. Thanks to Doug McNeil for this news. Here is a story about the case.

News21 Studies All State Records for Voter Fraud Since 2000, Finds Only Ten Cases of Impersonation of Voters at Polls

News21 is a project founded in 2005 by several journalism schools, to promote excellence in journalism. Read about News21 here. Recently News21 released a comprehensive study of all types of voter or elections fraud in the U.S., back to 2000. All fifty states were canvassed. The project found only ten instances at which anyone had tried to impersonate another person while trying to vote at the polls. The project found a great deal of voter fraud, but impersonation of others at the polls was miniscule compared to other types of fraud. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Ralph Nader Files Opening Brief in U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C., on FEC Failure to Act in Nader Complaint Against Democratic Party in 2004

On August 10, Ralph Nader filed this opening brief in Nader v Federal Election Commission. The Democratic Party and many of its close allies spent millions of dollars to remove Nader from ballots in 18 states in 2004, but didn’t follow federal campaign laws when it made these expenditures. Nader had then complained to the FEC, but the FEC not only didn’t enforce the law, it didn’t even notify the Democratic Party about the Nader complaint. Nader then sued the FEC in U.S. District Court, but the U.S. District Court, though agreeing that the FEC had not followed the law, said the FEC had only committed “harmless error.” Nader asks the U.S. Court of Appeals to overturn the U.S. District Court decision.

Part of the reason this case was filed so many years after the 2004 election is that the FEC did nothing with the complaint for several years.