For Fourth Year in a Row, Mississippi Legislature Won’t Restore the Statewide Initiative Process

In 2021 the Mississippi State Supreme Court removed the State Constitutional right for the voters to use the initiative process to alter state laws. The Court said the Constitutional provision was flawed because it said signatures had to come from all five U.S. House district, but after the 2000 census Mississippi only had four districts.

Ever since, bills have been introduced in the Mississippi legislature to bring back the initiative, but every time the bills die. See this story about the 2025 session.

Many Maine Bills to Amend Constitution to Allow Voters to Choose Secretary of State, Attorney General and Treasurer

Maine is one of only six states in which the only statewide executive officer chosen by the voters is Governor (or, a joint ticket of Governor and Lieutenant Governor). The other states are Alaska, Hawaii, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Tennessee.

Many bills are pending in the Maine legislature to amend the State Constitution and provide that the voters should choose Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Treasurer. Most of them have Republican sponsors, but LD 452 is introduced by Democratic State Senator Joe Baldacci. The other bills are HD 147, 149, 150, 455, and 508.

Because the bills amend the Constitution, they need two-thirds in each house of the legislature. Some of the bills provide for four-year terms, and others for two-year terms.

Currently the Maine legislature chooses the three executive officers.

Arizona Bill to Limit Number of Independent Candidates to Only One Per Office

Arizona State Senator Eva Diaz (D-Tolleson) has introduced HB 2844. It says that if two or more independent candidates file for the same office, they must face each other in a non-partisan primary, and whichever of them wins is the only independent candidate who can run in November.

The concept behind the bill seems to be a belief that all independent voters are associated together with each other, but this is false. Independent voters, collectively, have nothing in common with each other in the sense that members of a party have some beliefs in common.

The bill would not apply to presidential independent candidates.

Illinois Bill for a Top-Two System Would Even Extend to Presidential Elections

Illinois State Senator Rachel Ventura (D-Joliet) has introduced SB 2158, which would establish a top-two system. It even extends the top-two system to presidential elections. Here is the text. See page 45 of the bill, in which section 7-60 would say, “Not withstanding any other provision of law, the two candidates in any primary election who receive the most votes in the primary election, regardless of the party affiliation of the candidates, shall be the only two candidates certified to participate in the general election.”

All Illinois primaries for federal and state office are in early March, so this bill, if enacted, would require anyone who wanted to run in November to file in late November of the odd year before the election year.

Ordinarily, supporters of top-two never write their bills or initiative to include presidential elections, because if they did, the major party presidential nominees wouldn’t be the same in each state. For example, in 2016, the Illinois presidential primary totals for the top three candidates were: Hillary Clinton 1,039,555; Bernie Sanders 999,494; Donald Trump 562,464. Under the terms of SB 2158, the only presidential candidates who would be on the November ballot in Illinois would have been Clinton and Sanders.