Cincinnati Republicans Express Resentment that Some Republican Nominees for County Office Have an Opponent on the Ballot

According to this newspaper story, Republicans in Cincinnati (Hamilton County, Ohio) are expressing unhappiness that the Democratic Party runs candidates in partisan races in the county, even though one particular candidate in particular, Martha Good, has run and lost five times and spends little money campaigning.

Republicans control all three branches of Ohio state government, and if they are unhappy with partisan judicial elections, they are free to begin the process of converting these elections to non-partisan elections, or possibly to eliminating judicial elections and making judges appointive. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Maine Newspaper Story on Possibility that Libertarian Party Could Qualify for Party Status

The Lewiston, Maine Sun Journal has this story, on whether it is possible that the Libertarian Party might poll 5% for either President or U.S. Senate. If the party reached that threshold in either race, it would become ballot-qualified for the first time in Maine since 1991-1992. However, even if the vote threshold is met, the party would need to also organize a town committee in fourteen of the sixteen counties by the spring of 2013.

If the party does that as well, it would then remain on the ballot for the future if it could get its registration up to approximately 15,000. The law would require that it have at least 10,000 registrants who turn out to vote in the general election. It doesn’t matter whom they vote for, but they must vote. This rather strange law for party retention was passed a few years ago by the legislature, which wanted to accomodate the Green Party and find a means for it to remain ballot-qualified even though it might not choose to run a gubernatorial nominee.

U.S. District Court Upholds Federal Limit on Total Contributions Made in a 2-Year Cycle to Federal Candidates and Parties

One of the less-known federal campaign finance restrictions controls how much money anyone may give during a 2-year cycle to all federal campaigns combined. On September 28, a 3-judge U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., upheld these limits. Here is the 15-page decision. The plaintiffs include an Alabama voter who wishes to give between $1,776 and $2,500 to dozens of different Republican congressional candidates. Another plaintiff is the Republican National Committee.

Current law sets limits of an aggregate of $46,200 to candidates and their authorized committees or more than $70,800 to anyone else. Of that $70,800, no more than $46,200 may be contributions to political committees that are not national political party committees. Therefore, the plaintiff, Shaun McCutcheon, may not give the maximum individual contribution to more than eighteen candidates, even though he wants to give to dozens more candidates. The decision says that the U.S. Supreme Court has, over the years, upheld existing contribution limits to political parties, and therefore the U.S. District Court will uphold this particular law. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

A Personal “Thank You” to Eric Garris, my Webmaster, and his Technical Assistant, Michael Ewens

The mood strikes me to express my heartfelt gratitude to Eric Garris, who not only acts as the webmaster for Ballot Access News, but pays to have the page hosted, and is constantly on call to help me with technical problems. He, in turn, is helped by his assistant, Mike Ewens.

Various unscrupulous sellers of drugs have been hacking this web page, and Eric and Mike are taking very time-consuming steps to solve the problem.