Federal Court Allows Hawaii Redistricting Plan to Exclude Students and Military Who Appear Not to be Permanent Hawaii Residents

On May 22, a 3-judge U.S. District Court in Hawaii issued a 55-page ruling in Kostick v Nago, 1:12-cv-184. The panel denied injunctive relief to a group of voters who had sued to alter the redistricting plan for state legislative districts. The Hawaii Constitution says redistricting should be based on permanent residents, so the state had altered the Census Data to exclude students and military who seem not to consider Hawaii their permanent residence.

The decision says that the issues are complex, but that no injunction postponing the primary and ordering a new set of districts will be granted. The decision says the lawsuit should have been filed earlier, and points out that if relief were granted, the August primary would need to be postponed. The three judges did not say which one of them wrote the opinion. The three are M. Margaret McKeown of the 9th circuit, and U.S. District Court Judges J. Michael Seabright and Leslie E. Kobayashi.

Census data asks people about their “usual residence”, which means “the place where a person lives and sleeps most of the time” and “is not necessarily the same as the person’s voting residence or legal residence.” The decision does acknowledge that “Hawaii elected officials still represent temporary residents – it is a fundamental Constitutional principle that elected officials represent all the people in their districts, including those who do nor or cannot vote.” The excluded groups include about 8% of the population of Hawaii.

Mitt Romney Says a Presidential Candidate Needs 50% of the Vote to be Elected President

According to this news story, Mitt Romney recently said he needs 50.1% of the vote to be elected President. In the context, it seems obvious he meant the popular vote.

Of course, this is not true. Presidents who have been elected with less than 50% of the popular vote include John Quincy Adams, James Polk, Zachery Taylor, James Buchanan, Abraham Lincoln, Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Grover Cleveland (twice), Benjamin Harrison, Woodrow Wilson (twice), Harry Truman, John Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton (twice), and George W. Bush.

Montana Independent Candidate Petition Deadline Held Unconstitutional

On May 25, U.S. District Court Judge Sam Haddon ruled that Montana’s March petition deadline for non-presidential independent candidates is unconstitutionally early. The case is Kelly v McCulloch, cv-08-25. Montana’s petition deadline for non-presidential independent candidates had been in June between 1973 and 2007, but in 2007 the legislature moved it to March. Here is the 22-page opinion. UPDATE: here is a newspaper story about the decision.

Steve Kelly, who desired to be an independent candidate for U.S. Senate in 2008, had then sued to overturn the new early deadline. Judge Haddon had initially ruled that Kelly lacks standing, because he had not attempted to petition in 2008. But the 9th circuit had reversed the standing decision, and had sent the case back to the U.S. District Court for a ruling on the merits. That decision has now been issued. The Montana legislature won’t be in session until 2013, so presumably the Secretary of State will administratively set a new deadline to be in effect for the 2012 election. In this lawsuit, Kelly was represented by the ACLU.

The Montana independent candidate procedure is also a means for unqualified parties to appear on the general election ballot. Montana has always permitted independent candidates to choose a partisan label, which appears on the ballot in place of the word “independent”. So, in effect, the Montana independent petition procedure functions as a means for unqualified parties to also get on the ballot. The decision upholds the number of signatures for independent candidates, which is 5% of the vote for the winning candidate in the previous election. The number of signatures averages out to 3% of the last vote cast. The opinion says nothing whatsoever about the plaintiff’s point that the full party petition is only 5,000 signatures, and it doesn’t seem rational to require an independent candidate for statewide office to collect approximately twice as many signatures as are needed for a new qualified party. Also, independent presidential candidates just need 5,000 signatures.

The opinion also upholds the filing fee, which is 1% of the salary for the office. Montana law provides a way around the filing fee for candidates who can’t afford it.

The Montana decision is the third one this year to strike down, or enjoin, a too-early petition deadline for independent candidates or newly-qualifying parties. The others have been in Tennessee (April too early) and California (January too early).